Abstract:Purpose Whilst the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance has been well documented, CSR has rarely been studied from the perspective of corporate poverty alleviation. This study aims to test whether participation in targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) affects firms' market value and to explore how the magnitudes of market value vary in different CSR environments. Design/methodology/approach Based on recent Chinese TPA initiatives and on 108 TPA announcements of Chinese-listed firms from 2016 to 2020, this study adopts an event study method to investigate the impact of firm's TPA announcements on the firm's market value. Then, the authors construct a cross-sectional regression to analyse different CSR factors that may affect market reactions. Findings The results demonstrate that TPA announcements can increase a firm's overall market value. Additionally, the results show that TPA way and firm ownership significantly moderate the market reaction, namely the positive reaction is more significant when the TPA announcements involve charity poverty alleviation rather than industrial poverty alleviation and for privately owned firms rather than state-owned firms. Practical implications The empirical results help TPA practitioners obtain a nuanced understanding of whether and when to participate in poverty alleviation is worthwhile. This study also provides a reference for poverty alleviation work in countries with similar backgrounds. Originality/value This study not only provides empirical evidence for the consequences of poverty alleviation behaviour of firms in developing countries, but also complements the field of CSR research in developed countries.

Sociopolitical Activity and Corporate Default Risk: Evidence from the Targeted Poverty Alleviation Program in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have Influence on Firms' Access to Trade Credit

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from Chinese targeted poverty alleviation

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Litigation Risk and Corporate Social Responsibility—Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China

Targeted poverty alleviation and corporate financial performance: The CSR strategy perspective

Has Corporate Involvement in Government-Initiated Corporate Social Responsibility Activities Increased Corporate Value?—evidence from China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation

Targeted poverty alleviation and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China

Targeted Poverty Alleviation Initiatives, Corporate Governance Structures and Corporate Value: Evidence from China

Targeted Poverty Alleviation Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

TARGETED POVERTY ALLEVIATION AND STOCK PRICE CRASH RISK: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

Government Initiated Corporate Social Responsibility Activities: Evidence from a Poverty Alleviation Campaign in China

Do political connections affect corporate poverty alleviation decisions? Evidence from China

Does Targeted Poverty Alleviation Disclosure Improve Stock Performance?

Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

Corruption and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China⋆

Government-initiated corporate social responsibility and performance growth—Evidence from enterprise engagement in targeted poverty alleviation in China

Corporate Social Responsibility Rating, Corporate Governance, and Financial Distress: Evidence from China

Corporate environmental responsibility and default risk: Evidence from China