Abstract:Purpose Whilst the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance has been well documented, CSR has rarely been studied from the perspective of corporate poverty alleviation. This study aims to test whether participation in targeted poverty alleviation (TPA) affects firms' market value and to explore how the magnitudes of market value vary in different CSR environments. Design/methodology/approach Based on recent Chinese TPA initiatives and on 108 TPA announcements of Chinese-listed firms from 2016 to 2020, this study adopts an event study method to investigate the impact of firm's TPA announcements on the firm's market value. Then, the authors construct a cross-sectional regression to analyse different CSR factors that may affect market reactions. Findings The results demonstrate that TPA announcements can increase a firm's overall market value. Additionally, the results show that TPA way and firm ownership significantly moderate the market reaction, namely the positive reaction is more significant when the TPA announcements involve charity poverty alleviation rather than industrial poverty alleviation and for privately owned firms rather than state-owned firms. Practical implications The empirical results help TPA practitioners obtain a nuanced understanding of whether and when to participate in poverty alleviation is worthwhile. This study also provides a reference for poverty alleviation work in countries with similar backgrounds. Originality/value This study not only provides empirical evidence for the consequences of poverty alleviation behaviour of firms in developing countries, but also complements the field of CSR research in developed countries.

Targeted poverty alleviation and the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and firm value: evidence from Chinese targeted poverty alleviation

Targeted poverty alleviation and corporate financial performance: The CSR strategy perspective

Does CSR affect the cost of equity capital: Empirical evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation of listed companies in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Targeted Poverty Alleviation Initiatives, Corporate Governance Structures and Corporate Value: Evidence from China

Targeted Poverty Alleviation Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Cumulative Effect, Targeted Poverty Alleviation, and Firm Value: Evidence from China

Does Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policy Reduce Poverty? Evidence From Rural China

Productivity effects of corporate income tax: Evidence from China

The peer effects of corporate poverty alleviation behavior: Empirical evidence from China

Evaluation of China’s Targeted Poverty Alleviation Policies: A Decomposition Analysis Based on the Poverty Reduction Effects

Does Ownership Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from Chinese Companies' Response to Targeted Poverty Alleviation

Chairman’s Communist Party of China member status and targeted poverty alleviation: Evidence from China

Do bond investors attend to corporate targeted poverty alleviation?

Do political connections affect corporate poverty alleviation decisions? Evidence from China

Narrowing urban-rural income gap in China: The role of the targeted poverty alleviation program

Does Villager Social Capital Hinder Poverty Targeting? Evidence from Poverty-Stricken County of Western China

Government-initiated corporate social responsibility and performance growth—Evidence from enterprise engagement in targeted poverty alleviation in China

Corporate philanthropy, political connections, and costs of equity capital

Effect of ESG performance on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from China