Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) in definition of tumor invasion depth staging (T staging) before operation.METHODS:Clinical and radiographic data of 49 rectal cancer patients who underwent radical resection within two weeks after 3.0 T high-resolution MRI examination without preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Peking University People's Hospital between February 2015 and November 2015 were retrospectively collected. Two radiologists reviewed the MRI imagines and evaluated the location and T staging of rectal cancer independently(radiologist A and B). The kappa statistics was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement, and kappa value greater than 0.81 indicated excellent agreement. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution MRI in definition of rectal cancer T staging were assessed with pathological result as golden standard.RESULTS:According to pathological result of 49 rectal cancer patients, 3 were pT1, 17 were pT2, 22 were pT3, and 7 were pT4a. In 2 cases of mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed focal or diffuse significantly higher signal close to perirectal fat. And in other 47 patients of non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, MRI T2WI showed equal or higher signal compared with pelvic muscle. Interobserver agreement was excellent in diagnosis of T staging of rectal cancer with 3.0T high-resolution MRI(Kappa=0.87). The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T1 staging was 95.9%(47/49), 1/3 and 100%(46/46) respectively, besides, 1 case was both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. For 2 radiologists, the accuracy of T2 staging was 87.8%(43/49) and 91.8%(45/49) respectively, the sensitivity was both 88.2%(15/17), and the specificity was 87.5%(28/32) and 93.5%(30/32) respectively, besides, 15 cases were both diagnosed correctly and 2 cases were overstaged. The accuracy for T3 staging was 89.8%(44/49) and 93.9%(46/49) respectively, the sensitivity was 86.4%(19/22) and 95.5%(21/22) respectively, and the specificity was both 92.6%(25/27). Radiologist A made correct diagnosis for 19 cases, understaged 2 cases and overstaged 1 case. Radiologist B made correct diagnosis for 21 cases and only overstaged 1 case. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of both radiologists for T4a staging was 98.0%(48/49), 7/7 and 97.6%(41/42) respectively, besides, 7 cases were both diagnosed correctly. The overall accuracy of T staging was 85.7%(42/49) and 89.8%(44/49) by two radiologists respectively. The accuracy for differentiating T1/T2 from T3/T4 was 91.8%(45/49) and 95.9%(47/49) by two radiologists respectively. Radiologist A overstaged 2 cases and understaged 2 cases, and radiologist B overstaged 2 cases.CONCLUSION:High-resolution MRI can accurately evaluate preoperative T staging of rectal cancer and help select the high-risk rectal cancer patients with over T3 to receive neoadjuvant treatment.

Feasibility of Three-Dimension Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Predicting Tumor and Node Staging in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: an Exploration of Optimal ROI Measurement

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Evaluation

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI: Capability for Predicting Therapeutic Effect of Chemoradiotherapy on Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Three-dimension amide proton transfer MRI of rectal adenocarcinoma: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors and comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging

The Preoperative Diagnostic Performance of Multi-Parametric Quantitative Assessment in Rectal Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study Using Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI for assessing rectal adenocarcinoma T-staging and perineural invasion: a prospective study

Assessing the Histopathological Features of Rectal Adenocarcinoma with Chemical Shift-Encoded Sequence (CSE)-MRI and Diffusion- Weighted Imaging (DWI)

Evaluation of High Resolution Thin Slice Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (3.0T RESOLVE-DWI) in Clinical Staging of Rectal Cancer

Diagnostic Value of 3.0-Tesla High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Invasion Depth of ;rectal Cancer

Direct Radiofrequency Saturation Corrected Amide Proton Transfer Tumor MRI at 3T

Assessment of T Staging and Mesorectal Fascia Status Using High-Resolution Mri in Rectal Cancer with Rectal Distention

Clinical Feasibility Assessment of T3 Sub-Stage in Rectal Cancer Using MRI

Chemical Shift-Encoded Sequence (IDEAL-IQ) and Amide Proton Transfer (APT) MRI for Prediction of Histopathological Factors of Rectal Cancer.

Glucose Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI for Predicting the Histological Grade of Rectal Cancer: a Comparative Study with Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement

Evaluation of the Extent of Mesorectal Invasion and Mesorectal Fascia Involvement in Patients with T3 Rectal Cancer with 2-D and 3-D Transrectal Ultrasound: A Pilot Comparison Study with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings

The Value of 2D MRI and 3D MRI Sequences in Preoperative Staging of Rectal Cancer

Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Histological Characterization of Rectal Cancer: Impact of Different Region-of-Interest Positioning Protocols on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.

Application of 3.0T MRI in the preoperative assessment of rectal carcinoma

Amide Proton Transfer (APT) and Magnetization Transfer (MT) in Predicting Short-Term Therapeutic Outcome in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: a Feasibility Study of Three-Dimensional Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI.