Amide Proton Transfer (APT) and Magnetization Transfer (MT) in Predicting Short-Term Therapeutic Outcome in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Chemoradiotherapy: a Feasibility Study of Three-Dimensional Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI.

Wenguang Liu,Xiao Wang,Simin Xie,Weiyin Vivian Liu,Ismail Bilal Masokano,Yu Bai,Juan Chen,Linhui Zhong,Yijing Luo,Gaofeng Zhou,Wenzheng Li,Yigang Pei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00602-6
IF: 5.605
2023-01-01
Cancer Imaging
Abstract:The three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer (3D CEST) technique is a novel and promising magnetic resonance sequence; however, its application in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) lacks sufficient evaluation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the 3D CEST technique in predicting the short-term treatment outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in NPC patients. Forty NPC patients and fourteen healthy volunteers were enrolled and underwent the pre-treatment 3D CEST magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The reliability of 3D CEST was assessed in healthy volunteers by calculating the intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficient (ICC) for amide proton transfer weighted-signal intensity (APTw-SI) and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) values. NPC patients were divided into residual and non-residual groups based on short-term treatment outcomes after CRT. Whole-tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn to measure APTw-SI, MTR and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Multivariate analysis and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were used to evaluate the prediction performance of clinical characteristics, APTw-SI, MTR, ADC values, and combined models in predicting short-term treatment outcomes in NPC patients. For the healthy volunteer group, all APTw-SI and MTR values exhibited good to excellent intra- and inter-observer agreements (0.736–0.910, 0.895–0.981, all P > 0.05). For NPC patients, MTR values showed a significant difference between the non-residual and residual groups (31.24 ± 5.21
What problem does this paper attempt to address?