Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Ting-ting GUO,Song LIU,Nan ZHOU,Zheng-yang ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.04.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the value of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods: Twenty-seven patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma proved by biopsy pathology were enrolled. Those patients underwent MRI at the time points of pretreatment (group 1), one month after the start of radiotherapy (group 2) and one month after the end of radiotherapy (group 3). T1WI, T2WI, IVIM (9 b-factors, 0~800 s/mm2) and contrast-enhanced T1WI were included. They received concurrent chemotherapy for 3 cycles during radiotherapy. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived from the mono-exponential model, while the diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f) and pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated via the bi-exponential model. The values of IVIM parameters and maximum area for NPC lesions were measured at each time point, and their dynamic changes and correlation were analyzed. Results: Patients whose images had artifact were excluded, and 23 patients were included in this study finally. The ADC and D values increased throughout the whole course. ADC value of group 1 and 3 was 0.80×10-3 mm2/s and 1.57×10-3 mm2/s, respectively (P1/3<0.001); D value of group 1 and 3 was 0.68×10-3 mm2/s and 1.31×10-3 mm2/s, respectively (P1/3<0.001). f value was increased originally then decreased. f value of group 1 and 2 was 11% and 19% (P1/2<0.001). There were no correlations between group 1 and group 2, group 1 and group 3, group 2 and group 3 for D* value. Conclusion: IVIM-MRI could monitor dynamic changes of NPC during treatment. ADC value was influenced by microcirculation perfusion, therefore the diffusion of water molecules were overrated. D value was calculated from high b values (>200 s/mm2), so microcirculation perfusion had little effect on MR signal, it reflected pure diffusion information. D value was better at monitoring the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy. f value might be a potential biomarker.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?