Abstract:This paper studies the impact of capital regulatory reform on firm behavior. We develop a portfolio-choice model to investigate how capital regulatory reforms influence the risk-taking behavior of financial institutions with different capital adequacy levels. The model predicts that as regulation becomes more stringent, either all firms reduce their risk-taking, or there exists a capital-adequacy threshold below which risk-taking increases. The Chinese insurance solvency regulatory reform provides a unique natural experiment to examine firms' risk-taking responses to the capital shock driven by the reform. We find that increasing regulatory pressure – i.e. a more stringent regulation – induces greater risk-taking for less capital-adequate insurers, the insurers whose risk-taking the regulator most wants to reduce. We rule out the potential reverse causality that insurers' risk structures prior to the reform determine their degrees of capital shock and that insurers target low capital-adequate positions by taking more risks prior to the reform. Our results suggest that reinforcing the qualitative risk assessment, increasing the penalties of insolvent insurers, and increasing the risk sensitivity of capital requirements could be effective policy remedies for this backfiring problem.

Corporate Responses to Systemic Risk: Talk and Action

Environmental Performance and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Stock Market Reaction To Data Breaches: The Moderating Role Of Corporate Social Responsibility

Media Coverage and Corporate Risk-Taking: International Evidence

Corporate social responsibility and firm-level systematic risk: The moderating effect of economic policy uncertainty

Risk Shocks, Uncertainty Shocks, and Corporate Policies

Corporate Climate Risk: Measurements and Responses

Risk Shocks and Corporate Policies: A Text-Based Analysis

Corporate risk disclosures in turbulent times: An international analysis in the global financial crisis

Empirical Study on Chinese Corporate Risk Management

Do Firm-Level Factors Play Forward-Looking Role for Financial Systemic Risk: Evidence from China

Media attention and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China

Uncertainty Shocks and Corporate Policies

Corporate Risk-Taking, Opportunistic Earnings Management and Information Opacity: Evidence from China

Can Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Reduce Firms’ Idiosyncratic Risk? Evidence From China

Endogenous Risk-Exposure and Systemic Instability

Adverse impact of capital regulatory reform and policy remedy: theory and evidence

How Does Regulatory Pressure Shock Affect Firms’ Risk-Taking Behavior? Theory and Evidence

Boardroom Centrality and Systematic Risk

Enforcement actions and systemic risk

Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence