Abstract:International experiences have underscored the dual implications of financial openness. Given China's unique circumstances and its escalating level of financial openness, it is crucial to assess potential impacts on the country's bank systemic risk. This paper uses the quarterly data of 37 listed banks in China from 2010 to 2022 to explore the relationship between financial openness and systemic risk of the banking system, the mechanism of action, and the moderating effect of macroprudential policy on the two. The findings indicate an inverted "U"-shaped correlation between financial openness and bank systemic risk. On one side of this shape, financial openness primarily exacerbates funding mismatch, thereby increasing the systemic risk of banks. Conversely, on the other side, it primarily alleviates systemic risk by optimizing capital management. Moreover, with the help of macroprudential supervision, the inverted "U"-shaped relationship between financial openness and bank systemic risk leads to a lower level of systemic risk and, at the same time, promotes the early arrival of the inverted "U"-shaped inflection point between financial openness and bank systemic risk. Notably, the impact of financial openness on the systemic risk of joint-stock commercial banks, urban commercial banks, and rural commercial banks is more significant. The above research results provide a regulatory reference for effectively preventing and resolving systemic risk while achieving high-quality openness to the outside world. In deepening financial openness, the banking industry needs to pay attention to the funding mismatch and the efficiency of capital management and implement differential risk supervision and prevention mechanisms for banks with different ownership, which is conducive to the reduction of bank systematic risk.

Enforcement actions and systemic risk

Do Firm-Level Factors Play Forward-Looking Role for Financial Systemic Risk: Evidence from China

Measuring and Predicting Systemic Risk in the Chinese Banking System

Local government debt, real estate credit, and systemic risk of commercial banks

Interconnectedness and Systemic Risk of China's Financial Institutions

Bank risk taking, efficiency, and law enforcement: Evidence from Chinese city commercial banks

Monetary Policy, Capital Regulation and Systemic Risk in Commercial Banks: Evidence from in China

Measuring the Contribution of Chinese Financial Institutions to Systemic Risk: an Extended Asymmetric CoVaR Approach

Does Legal Enforcement Matter for Financial Risks ? The Case of Strategic Default in China ∗

Regulators' Disclosure Decisions: Evidence from Bank Enforcement Actions

Bank leverage and systemic risk: Impact of bank risk‐taking and inter‐bank business

Risk Assessment of Banks and Financial Institutions under COVID-19 Crisis

Selective enforcement of regulation

The contribution of (shadow) banks and real estate to systemic risk in China

Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

Financial Openness, Bank Systematic Risk, and Macroprudential Supervision

Systemic risk in the Chinese financial system: A panel Granger causality analysis

Analysis of China Commercial Banks’ Systemic Risk Sustainability through the Leave-One-Out Approach

Systemic risk, financial markets, and performance of financial institutions

A Survey of Systemic Risk in the Banking Industry

Chinese Shadow Banking System and the Construction of Systemic Risk Stress Index