High-performance In<sub>0.83</sub>Ga<sub>0.17</sub>As Extended Shortwave Infrared Photodetector with AlGaAsSb Barrier Structure

Yinlin Zhang,Chuang Li,Daqian Guo,Keming Cheng,Kai Shen,Jiang Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3432317
IF: 4.3
2024-01-01
IEEE Sensors Journal
Abstract:In this study, a barrier structure was proposed to enhance the efficiency of the In <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.83</sub> Ga <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.17</sub> As extended shortwave infrared photodetector. In the barrier infrared detector (BIRD), a wide-bandgap Al <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.2</sub> Ga <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.8</sub> As <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.255</sub> Sb <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0.745</sub> layer was employed as the electron barrier. The dark current density of the BIRD is approximately 100 times less than that of the detector with p-i-n (PIN) structures, especially at temperatures below 240K. The peak specific detectivity of the BIRD reaches 6.4×10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">13</sup> cm·Hz <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1/2</sup> ·W <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , exhibiting a tenfold improvement over the PIN detector at 200K. The quantum efficiency (QE) of the BIRD gets saturation (~46.7%) at zero bias, suggesting good carrier extraction capabilities as that in the PIN detector. At 300K, the peak specific detectivity (D*) of the BIRD is 1.23×10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">11</sup> cm·Hz <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1/2</sup> ·W <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> , which is 33% higher than that of the PIN detector of ~9.21×10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">10</sup> cm·Hz <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1/2</sup> ·W <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> . The influence of trap density on the device performance was also studied. When the dark current density reaches ~8.2×10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-8</sup> A/cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , the trap density for the PIN is around 3.5 ×1015 cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-3</sup> , lower by a factor of 100 compared to that of the BIRD. As revealed by the research results, the tolerance of the trap density of the devices can be significantly increased by the incorporation of a barrier structure.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?