Abstract:For rubber-like materials, there are three popular methods of equibiaxial tension available: inflation tension, equibiaxial planar tension, and radial tension. However, no studies have addressed the accuracy and comparability of these tests. In this work, we model the tension tests for a hyperelastic electroactive polymer (EAP) membrane material using finite element method (FEM) and investigate their experimental accuracy. This study also analyzes the impact of apparatus structure parameters and specimen dimensions on experimental performances. Additionally, a tensile efficiency is proposed to assess non-uniform deformation in equibiaxial planar tension and radial tension tests. The sample points for calculating deformation in inflation tensions should be taken near the top of the inflated balloon to obtain a more accurate characteristic curve; the deformation simulation range will be constrained by the material model and its parameters within a specific limit (λ ≈ 1.9); if the inflation hole size is halved, the required air pressure must be doubled to maintain equivalent stress and strain values, resulting in a reduction in half in inflation height and decreased accuracy. The equibiaxial planar tension test can enhance uniform deformation and reduce stress errors to as low as 2.1% (at λ = 4) with single-corner-point tension. For circular diaphragm specimens in radial tension tests, increasing the number of cuts and using larger punched holes results in more uniform deformation and less stress error, with a minimum value of 3.83% achieved for a specimen with 24 cuts and a 5 mm punched hole. In terms of tensile efficiency, increasing the number of tensile points in the equibiaxial planar tension test can improve it; under radial tension, increasing the number of cuts and decreasing the diameter of the punched hole on the specimen has a hedging effect. The findings of this study are valuable for accurately evaluating various equibiaxial tension methods and analyzing their precision, as well as providing sound guidance for the effective design of testing apparatus and test plans.

Biaxial Tension Test of Soft Materials

J2-deformation-type Soil Model Coupled with State-Dependent Dilatancy and Fabric Evolution: Multiaxial Formulation and FEM Implementation

ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY OF CONCRETE FILLED RECTANGULAR BOX UNDER BIAXIAL BENDING MOMENT AND AXIAL FORCE

Fundamental problem in optimizing the biaxial testing specimen

Development of A Biaxial Compression Test Apparatus for Granular Materials

A Novel Biaxial Testing Apparatus for the Determination of Forming Limit under Hot Stamping Conditions

A novel mechanical attachment for biaxial tensile test: Application to formability evaluation for DP590 at different temperatures

An Investigation of Testing Methods on the Biaxial Mechanical Behaviors of Anisotropic Materials

Numerical Method for Biaxially Loaded Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Slender Columns with Arbitrary Section

Biaxial Testing of Thin Metal Sheets under Non-Proportional Loading Conditions

A complete three-dimensional finite element analysis of the bar-bar tensile impact apparatus

A Uniaxial Tension System and Its Applications in Testing of Thin Films and Small Components.

Biaxial compression numerical test of Soil-Rock Mixture

Biaxial Behaviour Of Plain Concrete Subjected To Dynamic Compression With Constant Lateral Stress

Study on fracture behavior in stiff-thin-film-on-soft-substrate structures under biaxial stress state

Biaxial Extension of Cruciform Specimens: Embedding Equilibrium Into Design and Constitutive Characterization

Simulation Analysis of Equibiaxial Tension Tests for Rubber-like Materials

Constitutive laws of softened UHPC in biaxial tension-compression: Experimental study using a planar bi-directional element tester

Testing Structural Elements under Multiaxial Loading: A Numerical Model of the Bench to Understand and Predict Complex Boundary Conditions

Quasi-static Test Research of Reinforced Concrete Column Under Biaxial Loading

Experimental Tests on Reinforced Concrete Columns under Biaxial Quasi-Static Loading