Abstract:To present our initial experience on the feasibility of robotic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to left renal vein via single docking approach by high port insertion technique followed by left shoulder docking as a rescue backup procedure in surgically obstructed patients undergoing surgical staging because of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Prospective observational preliminary study. Canadian Task Force classification II-3. Tertiary-care academic affiliated private hospital. Ten patients with LACC who underwent robotic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2014. All patients with pathologically proven cervical cancer underwent a PET/CT scanning in a similar fashion at the department of nuclear medicine. PET/CT scans were evaluated by the nuclear medicine specialist. Following pre-operative work-up, robot-assisted transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed up to left renal vein by the same experienced surgeon. Sections of 5 mm were performed and stained with routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and node count was done separately by experienced gynecopathologist. During the study period, 12 consecutive patients with LACC were counseled for pre-therapeutic robot-assisted transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Two patients declined the procedure and underwent standardized chemo-radiation therapy whereas remaining ten patients constituted the study group. In the study group, the median age was 46 years (range 33–59 years), and the median body mass index 28.5 kg/m2 (range 18.5–35.1 kg/m2). Clinical staging was stage IIB in four patients, IIIB in four, and IVA in one. Histopathological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in nine patients, and adenocarcinoma in one. On PET/CT scans, seven out of ten patients were positive for pelvic lymph node metastasis. With respect to para-aortic area, only one of the ten patients had suspected metastasis in PET/CT. For nine patients with LACC, the median docking time was 6.5 min (range 4–15 min), and the median operating time for para-aortic lymphadenectomy was 120 min (range 60–165 min). The median trocar time was 14.5 min (range 5–45 min). In two out of ten patients, the surgical removal of whole lymphatic tissue between inferior mesenteric artery and left renal vein was not completely possible by a single docking of robotic column. Therefore, a new optic trocar was placed in the umbilicus and the robotic column was relocated over the left shoulder of the patient and residual lymphatic tissue measuring approximately 2 cm in the long axis immediately below the left renal vein was removed and the surgery was completed up to the left renal vein. All para-aortic lymphadenectomies have been completed by robotic route. There were no intra-operative complications. No patient received a blood transfusion. Early post-operative grade 2 and 3a complications according to Dindo classification occurred in two patients: one symptomatic lymphocyst and one local infection on assistant port site in one patient. The patient with suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis in PET/CT showed no metastatic disease on histopathologic exam of para-aortic lymph nodes. The patient with recurrent disease and negative para-aortic lymph nodes on frozen section examination underwent robot-assisted total pelvic exenteration. Five of the residual eight patients had histologically proven metastasis in the para-aortic lymph node(s). Treatment modification occurred in six patients related to pre-treatment staging surgery. According to pathological results, extended field radiation therapy has been added in five patients and it was omitted in one patient. The median time interval between surgery and initiation of radiotherapy was 12 days (range 6–23 days). Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to left renal vein by high port insertion technique is a safe and feasible option for staging and treatment planning. However, technically, it is obstructed in a small group of patients and nodal staging surgery up to left renal vein can be completed by consecutive left shoulder docking approach as a backup rescue plan.

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer Using a Single-Position Supine Approach: A Case Report and Literature Review

[Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Modified Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Carcinoma].

Case Report: Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis and Abdominal Cocoon

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumor:report of 15 cases

laparoscopic retropenitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of testicular tumor

Single-stage retrocrural and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumor: The University of Southern California experience.

Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Initial Experience

Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

Efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedlaparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissection fortesticularmalignanttumor

Comparison of Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Experience of the Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy via Completely Posterior and Intrafascial Approach: A Report of 5 Cases

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage II testicular seminoma: a systematic review

Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review

Eleven-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors

Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?

Retroperitoneal robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study at two institutions

Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer

Unilateral Post-Chemotherapy Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Stage II Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Sexual and Reproductive Outcomes

Totally retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff without repositioning