Abstract:Objective: Since the first report on 1992 by Rukstalis and Chodak, laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RLND) remains the most accurate method of assessing lymph node status in clinically stage I and II nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT).1–4 Most of the RLND were performed trans peritoneal cavity. LeBlanc et al reported the L-RLND via retroperitoneal approach, which could avoid the interference to abdominal organs and get better exposure.4–6 We made some modifications to improve this technique and investigated the surgical techniques and clinical feasibility of the extraperitoneal L-RLND (EL-RLND). Materials and Methods: Three patients with primary testicular NSGCT on the right side received EL-RLND at 16, 28, and 31 days after orchiectomy. An incision of approximately 15 mm was made 2 cm medial to the right anterior superior iliac spine. The fascia of the external oblique muscles was cut. The internal oblique and transverse muscles were then bluntly divided. The retroperitoneal space was developed by inflating a preperitoneal balloon device with 900 mL of air. After removing the balloon device, a 10-mm laparoscopic trocar was placed at the existing surgical wound, which served as the camera port. Under laparoscopic observation, additional trocars were placed along the lateral border of the ipsilateral rectus abdominis or along the middle axillary line. The aorta, inferior vena cava, and surrounding adipose and lymphoid tissue were exposed. Dissection and ligation of testicular blood vessels and vas deferens were performed. Then, all para-aortic tissue lateral to the aorta and preaortic tissue cephalad to the inferior mesenteric artery was removed. The boundaries of dissection included renal vein (proximal), bifurcation of common iliac vessel (distal), ureter (lateral), and para-abdominal aorta/inferior vena cava area (medial). All tissue specimens were placed in an organ entrapment sack and removed. Results: The EL-RLND was performed in all the three patients. The average operating time was 180 min, the average intraoperative blood loss was 350 mL, the postoperative intestinal function recovery time was 2 days, and the average hospitalization time was 7 days. Follow-up revealed no evidence of recurrence or distant metastasis. Conclusions: EL-RLND that can be further applied is an operation for nonseminomatous testis cancer with minimal invasiveness, quick recovery. Because it is a difficult and complicated procedure performed near the large vessels, EL-RLND needs more experience on laparoscopic techniques to minimize complications. No competing financial interests exist. Runtime of video: 9 mins 9 secs

Comparison of Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

[Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Modified Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Testicular Carcinoma].

Can Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Ultra-Radical Hysterectomy Play a Role in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer? A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer

laparoscopic retropenitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of testicular tumor

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study at two institutions

Clinical Outcomes of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Before Versus after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy

Efficacyandsafetyofrobotassistedlaparoscopicretroperitoneallymphnodedissection fortesticularmalignanttumor

Eleven-Year Experience With Midline Extraperitoneal Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Germ Cell Tumors

Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection

Single-stage retrocrural and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumor: The University of Southern California experience.

Retroperitoneal robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China

Outcomes after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in men with stage 2 non-seminomatous germ cell tumour: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Testicular Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Initial Experience

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-Low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicentre Lateral Node Study in China.

Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a double-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial

Oncological Outcomes of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection During Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Renal Pelvic or Upper Ureteral Tumors: Matched-Pair Analysis

Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in stage II testicular seminoma: a systematic review

Short‐term and Long‐term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle‐low Rectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Lateral Node Study in China

Comparative study between robotic-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and retroper-itoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in treatment of early renal carcinoma