Abstract:Abstract Many studies about eTandem and language learning stem from learners in Western institutions of higher education. Unfortunately, there is a lack of research investigating the telecollaboration regarding language development between learners in the East and the West. Against this backdrop, a small-scale, six-week Chinese-English eTandem project focusing on learners’ language learning processes and experiences was undertaken between nine Chinese university students learning English in China and nine British university students learning Chinese in the UK. Multiple datasets were collected from learners’ diaries, synchronous Skype communication recordings, email exchanges, interviews and a post-project survey. This paper reports the main language error types made by Chinese L2 learners of English and error correction strategies provided by eTandem partners of competent L1 English speakers, along with how Chinese participants responded to the corrections. A thorough analysis of the research data indicated three types of linguistic errors in written tasks made by Chinese L2 learners of English: grammatical, lexical and idiomatic expressions. Another finding was that, although explicit written correction was the most commonly used strategy in email exchanges, learners preferred explanations with examples. In addition to previously established gains of eTandem learning, such as authentic communication, forging friendship and promoting intercultural awareness, positive responses to competent L1 partners’ error corrections was another major benefit indicated in our data. Our study pinpoints the importance of both pre-project training of participants on error-correction strategies with examples and how to respond to partner feedback in future eTandem projects.

Other-correction and Epistemic Imbalances in Teacher–student Interactions

Involving native speakers in oral corrective focused grammar feedback while conversing: an activity theory perspective

Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners' passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy

Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing from a Sociocultural Perspective

EFL Learners’ Corrective Feedback Decision-Making in Task-Based Peer Interaction

Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms

How Can EFL Teachers Make Their Questions More Interactive with Students? Interpersonal Patterns of Teacher Questions

A Study of Teacher Talk in Interactions in English Classes

Rethinking the Role of Corrective Feedback in Communicative Language Teaching

Differences Between Chinese and Western English-speaking Teachers in Providing Disagreement in EFL Teaching in China

A Review of Studies on Corrective Feedback in Interaction

An Investigation of Syntactic Errors in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Compositions: A Cohort Study

Exploring Factors Influencing Grammatical Error Rates in Conversational vs. Monologue Settings: A Study of Chinese English as a Foreign Language Learners

Exploring language learning and corrective feedback in an eTandem project

Interpersonal written corrective feedback: A case study of reading log feedback

A cross-cultural comparison in pedagogical beliefs about oral corrective feedback: the case of English language teachers in China versus the U.S.

Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008)

Error Correction in College EFL Writing Instruction: Students' Expectations and Correction Effects

An Investigation into Cognition and Thought Configuration of Learner "Errors"

One Journal, Different Practices: A Corpus-Based Study of Interactive Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics

Apologies in Emails: Interactions Between Chinese EFL Learners and Their Foreign Peers