Abstract:Although a large body of research has developed on corrective feedback in second language acquisition (SLA) in the past 30 years, there are few empirical studies examining the relationship between feedback timing and SLA. To begin to address this gap, this study reviews the existing research on the impact of corrective feedback timing on SLA. It aims to investigate the possible influential factors that might have led to inconsistent research findings and theoretical explanations. The review was conducted according to PRISMA-statement through searches in peer-reviewed electronic databases including Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, EBSCO, which includes ERIC and the British Education Index and gray literature (doctoral dissertations in ProQuest). Twenty studies conducted and published between 2006 and 2021 were finally analyzed to reveal the current trends. The results of this review indicate that there is no definite answer to the question of when errors in L2 should be treated. The difficulty of drawing a conclusive finding can be attributed to the communicative modality examined and variations in research design, including the explicitness of feedback and various ways of measuring feedback timing. No certain theoretical framework has been applied to guide these studies and they have applied different theoretical explanations to interpret the inconsistent results. The review highlights the need to continue to investigate the effectiveness of corrective feedback under different timing conditions. In addition, it discusses some research gaps that should be addressed in future studies and suggests future research directions in the area of feedback timing.

Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008)

Analysis and Correction of English Language Learners’ Errors

An Error Analysis of English Non-finite Verbs Misused by Chinese College Non-English Major Learners

Error Correction in College EFL Writing Instruction: Students' Expectations and Correction Effects

Error Analysis – Types and Causes of Errors in English Writing among Chinese Students

On Overgeneralization: Its Concept and Utilization

Other-correction and Epistemic Imbalances in Teacher–student Interactions

Instructors' Debate over Error Feedback on Chinese International Students' Academic Writings in A U.S. University

When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs

Determining Efficient Post-writing Activity for Error Correction: Self-editing, Peer review, or Teacher Feedback?

Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?

Of Mouses and Mans: A Test of Errorless Versus Error‐Based Learning in Children

Evaluating Prompting Strategies for Grammatical Error Correction Based on Language Proficiency

Assessing the Efficacy of Grammar Error Correction: A Human Evaluation Approach in the Japanese Context

A Review Study of Error Analysis Theory

Effects of a xu-argument based iterative continuation task on an EFL learner’s linguistic and affective development: Evidence from errors, self-initiated error corrections, and foreign language learning attitude

Error Types and Error Correction Strategies in College Students' Spoken English

Optimal timing of treatment for errors in second language learning - A systematic review of corrective feedback timing

Research on the Role of Corrective Feedback in Teaching of Chinese as a Second Language: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cross-Linguistic Trends in Speech Errors: An Analysis of Sub-Lexical Errors in Cantonese

An Investigation of Syntactic Errors in Chinese Undergraduate EFL Learners’ Compositions: A Cohort Study