Endoscopic and Microscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for the Treatment of Far-Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study with a 24-Month Follow-Up
Fei Yang,Liangjuan Ren,Qingqing Ye,Jianhua Qi,Kai Xu,Rigao Chen,Xiaohong Fan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S302717
IF: 2.8319
2021-06-04
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Fei Yang, 1, * Liangjuan Ren, 1, * Qingqing Ye, 2, * Jianhua Qi, 1 Kai Xu, 1 Rigao Chen, 1 Xiaohong Fan 1 1 Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Spine Surgery, Yibin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yibin, Sichuan, People's Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Rigao Chen; Xiaohong Fan Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 39 Shierqiao Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China Tel +86 13880450622 ; +86 18981883960 Fax +86 28-87765483 Email ; Purpose: Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of far-migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is clinically challenging. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and interlaminar microscopic lumbar discectomy (IMLD) for the treatment of far-migrated LDH. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive cases of far-migrated LDH treated by IELD or IMLD. Clinical data and outcomes were assessed before the operation and 1 day and 3, 12, and 24 months after the surgery using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate patient satisfaction at the 24-month follow-up. Results: A significant reduction in leg pain and improvement in ODI (P< 0.01) were observed in both groups after surgery. Lower back pain (LBP) was reduced at 24 months postsurgery in the IELD group (P 0.05). There were significant intergroup differences in VAS LBP score at 1 day and 24 months postsurgery (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively) and in ODI at 24 months (p=0.03). The rate of excellent or good outcome was 90.32% with IELD and 78.95% with IMLD (p=0.55). Hospital stay and time to ambulation were shorter in the IELD group than in the IMLD group, but the former had a longer operative time (p< 0.01). Low and comparable complication rates were reported in the IELD (16.13%) and IMLD (10.53%) groups (p=0.70). Conclusion: Both IELD and IMLD achieve favorable clinical results in the treatment of far-migrated LDH, with only minor complications. Compared to IMLD, LBP was significantly reduced with IELD presumably because it involved less trauma. Keywords: minimally invasive spinal surgery, highly migrated lumbar disc herniation, interlaminar approach, downward migration, upward migration Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common disorders of the lumbar spine, 1 with disc fragment migration occurring in 35%–72% of cases. 2 , 3 Far-migrated disc herniation (DH) is accompanied by back pain and severe sciatica and can lead to sensory changes and motor weakness. 4 Such cases often respond poorly to conservative treatment and require surgical intervention. 5 Interlaminar microscopic lumbar discectomy (IMLD), which is considered as the gold standard procedure for the treatment of LDH, involves removal of part of the lamina, ligamentum flavum, and medial facet joints. 6–9 When there is herniation of a migrated disc, additional laminae or medial facet joints must be removed. 10 In 10%–20% of cases, iatrogenic lumbar instability may occur after open and microscopic fenestrated discectomy, leading to failed back surgery syndrome or reoperation. 11–13 With improvements in instrumentation and advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a popular approach that has several advantages over conventional discectomy including less paravertebral muscle injury, lower risk of iatrogenic instability, and rapid recovery. 14–17 Meanwhile, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy (PETLD) and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy are alternatives to microscopic discectomy for the treatment of various types of LDH, including severe and extremely difficult cases. 18 However, because of anatomic barriers and disc fragmentation, the treatment of far-migrated DH remains clinically challenging. 19–21 </sup -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology