Long-term outcomes of simple lumbar discectomy and the associated factors in young adult patients

Hua-feng ZHANG,Chun-de LI,Xian-yi LIU,Xiao-dong YI,Hong LIU,Hai-lin LU,Hong LI,Zheng-rong YU,Hao-lin SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2014.03.014
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the long-term outcomes in young adult patients with lumbar disc herniation undergoing simple lumbar discectomy and to investigate the associated factors. Methods The follow-up data of 34 young adult patients with lumbar disc herniation who were adopted form December 1999 to March 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ), Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ), subjective satisfaction degree in patients, recurrence and need for additional surgery. The lumbar level of herniation and the type of lumbar disc herniation were recorded in detail. Results In this group, 22 males and 12 females were followed up for a mean period of 137 months (range;120-159 months), whose mean age was 27.6 years old ( range;16-35 years ). The average VAS score of low back pain and leg pain was reduced by 7.15 points, and the average ODI score was reduced by 65.05 points postoperatively. In the latest follow-up, 79.4%of the patients were satisifed with their surgery. The gender and Body Mass Index ( BMI ) affected the improvement in the VAS and ODI scores slightly. The improvement in the VAS and ODI scores in the patients with disc herniation at the L5-S1 level was superior to the patient with disc herniation at the L4-5 level, and the differences were statistically signiifcant ( P<0.05 ). The improvement in the VAS and ODI scores postoperatively in the patients with non-contained disc herniation was better than that in the patients with contained disc herniation, and the differences were statistically signiifcant ( P<0.05 ). 38.4%of the patients ( n=13 ) had recurrent symptoms after the surgery. 9 patients got relieved after non-operative treatments, and 2 patients were being treated by non-operative treatments. Only 1 patient underwent lumbar discectomy once again due to recurrence in situ, and another one had posterior spinal canal decompression, pedicle screw ifxation and interbody fusion in the ifrst operation level because of adjacent segment degeneration and stenosis. Conclusions The long-term outcomes of only lumbar discectomy are satisfactory in young adult patients with lumbar disc herniation, which are not relevant to the gender and BMI, but are relevant to the level and type of lumbar disc herniation. The recurrence rate of postoperative symptoms is greater in young adult patients. However, most of them can recover after non-operative treatments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?