Ultrasound-based Nanomedicine for Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer: from Diagnostics to Theranostics
Ye Zhu,Ying Sun,Yourong Duan,Yaqing Chang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2021-0170
2021-01-01
Nanomedicine
Abstract:NanomedicineVol. 16, No. 23 EditorialUltrasound-based nanomedicine for molecular imaging of prostate cancer: from diagnostics to theranosticsYunkai Zhu‡, Ying Sun‡, Yourong Duan & Yaqing ChenYunkai Zhu‡ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-7994Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, PR China‡Authors contributed equallySearch for more papers by this author, Ying Sun‡State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200032, PR China‡Authors contributed equallySearch for more papers by this author, Yourong Duan *Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: yrduan@shsci.orghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3781-7845State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200032, PR ChinaSearch for more papers by this author & Yaqing Chen **Author for correspondence: E-mail Address: chenyaqing@xinhuamed.com.cnhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5132-0096Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 1665 Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, PR ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:14 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2021-0170AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleKeywords: drug deliverynanobubblenanodropletnanomedicineprostate cancertheranosticsultrasoundReferences1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(1), 7–33 (2021).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(3), 209–249 (2021).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Andreoiu M, Cheng L. Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications. Hum. Pathol. 41(6), 781–793 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4. Priester A, Natarajan S, Khoshnoodi P et al. Magnetic resonance imaging underestimation of prostate cancer geometry: use of patient specific molds to correlate images with whole mount pathology. J. Urol. 197(2), 320–326 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur. Urol. 79(2), 243–262 (2021).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6. Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ et al. Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 17(5), 479–505 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Grey A, Ahmed HU. Multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr. Opin. Urol. 26(1), 114–119 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8. Smeenge M, Tranquart F, Mannaerts CK et al. First-in-human ultrasound molecular imaging with a VEGFR2-specific ultrasound molecular contrast agent (BR55) in prostate cancer: a safety and feasibility pilot study. Invest. Radiol. 52(7), 419–427 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9. Wu H, Rognin NG, Krupka TM et al. Acoustic characterization and pharmacokinetic analyses of new nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 39(11), 2137–2146 (2013).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10. Zlitni A, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging agents for ultrasound. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 45, 113–120 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11. Wischhusen J, Padilla F. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) for localized drug delivery into tumor tissue. IRBM 40(1), 10–15 (2019).Crossref, Google Scholar12. Ding Y, Cao Q, Qian S et al. Optimized anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen single-chain variable fragment-loaded nanobubbles as a novel targeted ultrasound contrast agent for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J. Ultrasound Med. 39(4), 761–773 (2020).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13. Perera RH, de Leon A, Wang X et al. Real time ultrasound molecular imaging of prostate cancer with PSMA-targeted nanobubbles. Nanomedicine 28, 102213 (2020).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar14. Zhao M, Zhu Y, Zhang Y et al. CDCP1-targeted nanoparticles encapsulating phase-shift perfluorohexan for molecular US imaging in vitro. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. doi:10.3233/CH-200900 (2020) (Epub ahead of print).Crossref, Google Scholar15. Zhu Y, Sun Y, Liu W et al. Magnetic polymeric nanobubbles with optimized core size for MRI/ultrasound bimodal molecular imaging of prostate cancer. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 15(30), 2901–2916 (2020).Link, CAS, Google Scholar16. Wang Y, Lan M, Shen D et al. Targeted nanobubbles carrying indocyanine green for ultrasound, photoacoustic and fluorescence imaging of prostate cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 15, 4289–4309 (2020).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar17. Wu M, Wang Y, Wang Y et al. Paclitaxel-loaded and A10-3.2 aptamer-targeted poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Int. J. Nanomedicine 12, 5313–5330 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar18. Wu M, Zhao H, Guo L et al. Ultrasound-mediated nanobubble destruction (UMND) facilitates the delivery of A10-3.2 aptamer targeted and siRNA-loaded cationic nanobubbles for therapy of prostate cancer. Drug Deliv. 25(1), 226–240 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar19. You Y, Liang X, Yin T et al. Porphyrin-grafted lipid microbubbles for the enhanced efficacy of photodynamic therapy in prostate cancer through ultrasound-controlled in situ accumulation. Theranostics 8(6), 1665–1677 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Vol. 16, No. 23 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 81 times History Received 30 April 2021 Accepted 11 August 2021 Published online 14 September 2021 Published in print October 2021 Information© 2021 Future Medicine LtdKeywordsdrug deliverynanobubblenanodropletnanomedicineprostate cancertheranosticsultrasoundFinancial & competing interests disclosureThis project was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81671708, 81271595, 81572999, 81771839 and 81773272), Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center Research Project (no. 16CR3092B) and the Fund of Shanghai Jiaotong University (no. YG2014ZD04). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download