Amide-proton-transfer MRI signal as biomarker of glioma as assessed by image-guided needle biopsy

S. Jiang,J. Blakeley,C. Eberhart,M. Lim,A. Quinones-Hinojosa,Y. Zhang,H.Y. Heo,J. Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.08.239
IF: 4.4
2015-01-01
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Abstract:Background: Existing clinical MRI sequences are not tissue specific. Amide-proton-transfer (APT) imaging is a novel molecular technique that gives contrast via endogenous cellular proteins. Objective: We validate the diagnostic accuracy of applying APT imaging to glioma with neuropathology through targeted tissue sampling of APT imaging defined regions of interest (ROI). Materials and methods: 25 patients (14 untreated cases and 11 treated cases, mean age: 43.9 ± 7.1 years) with glioma were recruited and scanned, using a fast 3D APT imaging sequence. APT-weighted (APTw) signals were calculated using a magnetization-transfer-ratio-asymmetry analysis at ±3.5 ppm. Two to four feasible and meaningful ROI for each patient were sampled through the BrainLab neuro-navigation system. Results: In 9 untreated (without surgical intervention, radiotherapy or chemotherapy) patients with APTw hyperintensity within the lesions (2 cases did not show gadolinium enhancement), pathology showed that all lesions were high-grade gliomas (HGGs). In the remaining 5 untreated patients with APTw iso-intensity or mild punctate hyperintensity (one case with gadolinium enhancement), were found to be low-grade glioma (LGG). For 11 patients with questionable active tumor versus treatment effects, radiographic – pathologic correlation data showed that APTw hyperintensity was associated with tumor recurrence (9 cases), while APTw isointensity to mild hyperintensity indicated treatment effects (2 cases). Conclusions: APTw hyperintensity is a typical feature of HGG, which is independent of gadolinium enhancement. The APTw signal, as a surrogate biomarker of active glioma, has the potential to enhance the noninvasive diagnosis of grade of glioma, as well as active brain tumor vs. treatment effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?