Abstract:Objectives To analyze the value of amide proton transfer (APT) weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging in evaluation of prognostic factors for rectal adenocarcinoma, compared with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and Methods Preoperative pelvic MRI data of 110 patients with surgical pathologically confirmed diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent high-resolution T 2 -weighted imaging (T 2 WI), APT, IVIM, and DWI. Parameters including APT signal intensity (APT SI), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in different histopathologic types, grades, stages, and structure invasion statuses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, and the corresponding area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. Results APT SI, D and ADC values of rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) were significantly higher than those of rectal common adenocarcinoma (AC) ([3.192 ± 0.661%] vs . [2.333 ± 0.471%], [1.153 ± 0.238×10 -3 mm 2 /s] vs . [0.792 ± 0.173×10 -3 mm 2 /s], and [1.535 ± 0.203×10 -3 mm 2 /s] vs . [0.986 ± 0.124×10 -3 mm 2 /s], respectively; all P <0.001). In AC group, the APT SI and D values showed significant differences between low- and high-grade tumors ([2.226 ± 0.347%] vs . [2.668 ± 0.638%], and [0.842 ± 0.148×10 -3 mm 2 /s] vs . [0.777 ± 0.178×10 -3 mm 2 /s], respectively, both P <0.05). The D value had significant difference between positive and negative extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) tumors ([0.771 ± 0.175×10 -3 mm 2 /s] vs . [0.858 ± 0.151×10 -3 mm 2 /s], P <0.05). No significant difference of APT SI, D, D*, f or ADC was observed in different T stages, N stages, perineural and lymphovascular invasions (all P >0.05). The ROC curves showed that the AUCs of APT SI, D and ADC values for distinguishing MC from AC were 0.921, 0.893 and 0.995, respectively. The AUCs of APT SI and D values in distinguishing low- from high-grade AC were 0.737 and 0.663, respectively. The AUC of the D value for evaluating EMVI involvement was 0.646. Conclusion APT and IVIM were helpful to assess the prognostic factors related to rectal adenocarcinoma, including histopathological type, tumor grade and the EMVI status.

The Value of Amide Proton Transfer MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Urinary Bladder Lesions: Comparison With Diffusion‐Weighted Imaging

Evaluation of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging for Bladder Cancer Histopathologic Features: A Comparative Study with Diffusion- Weighted Imaging

Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI for renal tumors: Comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging

Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Ureteral Diseases

AB061. Can Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Be Efficient in the Differential Diagnosis of Uronephrosis and Pyonephrosis?

Preliminary exploration of amide proton transfer weighted imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant bone tumors

Comparative analysis of amide proton transfer and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing Ki-67, p53 and PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer

Amide Proton Transfer‐Weighted Imaging in Assessing the Aggressive and Proliferative Potential of Bladder Cancer

Combining Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted and Arterial Spin Labeling Imaging to Differentiate Solitary Brain Metastases from Glioblastomas

Comparative Study of Amide Proton Transfer‐Weighted Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Evaluation

Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Head and Neck Tumors with Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted MR Imaging

Amide Proton Transfer-weighted MRI combined with serum prostate-specific antigen levels for differentiating malignant prostate lesions from benign prostate lesions: a retrospective cohort study

Breast Amide Proton Transfer Imaging at 3 T: Diagnostic Performance and Association With Pathologic Characteristics

The role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of bladder urothelial cancer

Three-dimension amide proton transfer MRI of rectal adenocarcinoma: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors and comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging

Amide Proton Transfer Weighted and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma

Combined T2 SPAIR, Dynamic Enhancement and DW Imaging Reliably Detect T Staging and Grading of Bladder Cancer with 3.0T MRI

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

Predicting Preoperative Pathologic Grades of Bladder Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging

Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI for assessing rectal adenocarcinoma T-staging and perineural invasion: a prospective study

Risk Stratification of Abdominal Tumors in Children with Amide Proton Transfer Imaging