Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.

A New Common Weights DEA Model Based on Cluster Analysis

Combining common-weights DEA window with the Malmquist index: A case of China's iron and steel industry

Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: A method based on Shannon entropy weight

Data envelopment analysis method based on a common set of normalized weights using bargaining game thought

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

A new DEA common-weight multi-criteria decision-making approach for technology selection

Weight assurance region in two-stage additive efficiency decomposition DEA model: an application to school data

New Energy Listed Companies Competitiveness Evaluation Based on Modified Data Envelopment Analysis Model

Cone Ratio Models with Shared Resources and Nontransparent Allocation Parameters in Network DEA

A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Modeling Undesirable Output with a DEA Approach Based on an Exponential Transformation: an Application to Measure the Energy Efficiency of Chinese Industry

A Two-Step Centralized Model via Data Envelopment Analysis for Allocating Aggregate Carbon Emissions Abatements

Incorporating decision makers’ preferences into DEA and common weight DEA models based on the best–worst method (BWM)

Cone Ratio Models with Shared Resources and Unobservable Allocative Parameters in Network DEA

Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

A DEA based approach for identifying the optimal production scale of strongly context-dependent production units

A Novel Stochastic Two-Stage DEA Model for Evaluating Industrial Production and Waste Gas Treatment Systems

DEA cross-efficiency models with prospect theory and distance entropy: An empirical study on high-tech industries

Evaluation of the DEA efficiency of decision making units based on Pareto distribution

DEA Model for Parallel Production System with Environmental Constraint