Abstract:<p>The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is widely used as a multi-criteria decision-making method in practical applications. Several researchers have expanded the AHP method to D numbers AHP (D-AHP) to apply AHP to an uncertain decision-making environment. D numbers is an extension of the Dempster–Shafer (D-S) theory, which overcomes the shortcomings of the D-S theory and can effectively express uncertain information. With the deepening of research on the AHP method, the best–worst method (BWM) was proposed as an improvement to the AHP method. The BWM can lower the inconsistency in results and reduce the number of required pairwise comparisons. Although some researchers have extended the BWM method to an uncertain environment and proposed fuzzy BWM methods, these methods cannot handle some special situations, such as when the subjective evaluations of experts are conflicting or altogether missing. To apply the BWM method to these special situations, this study suggests combining the BWM with D numbers and proposes D numbers BWM (D-BWM) weighting model. First of all, we discuss D numbers extended fuzzy preference relations (DNFPRs). Afterwards, we design an algorithm to select the best and worst criteria based on the DNFPRs by calculating the out-degrees and in-degrees. Furthermore, we develop a linear programming model to derive the weights of criteria, and then propose a consistency ratio to check the reliability of the derived results. The experimental results show that the D-BWM method is more suitable for realistic decision-making because of its simplicity and sensitivity to subjective information. Finally, the proposed method is applied to evaluate the environmental performances of 30 provincial administrative regions of China.</p>

Incorporating decision makers’ preferences into DEA and common weight DEA models based on the best–worst method (BWM)

Evaluation of Decision-Making Units Based on the Weight-Optimized DEA Model.

Efficiency ranking with common set of weights based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree.

Ranking Decision Making Units Using Common-Weight DEA Model

Hybrid DEA-BWM-KEMIRA approach for multiple attribute decision-making: a weighted analysis perspective

Improved Interval DEA Models with Common Weight

Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model

Extended Secondary Goal Models for Weights Selection in DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation.

Determining common weights in data envelopment analysis based on the satisfaction degree

DEA Models Based on Competitive Decision Making Units

Data envelopment analysis method based on a common set of normalized weights using bargaining game thought

A Fuzzy DEA Model Based on Weighted Average Value of Fuzzy Numbers

DEA Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Based on Satisfaction Degree: an Application to Technology Selection

Hierarchical Decision-making using a New Mathematical Model based on the Best-worst Method

A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Ranking Decision Making Units Based on the Weight Set

Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross efficiency model

A cross-efficiency model using bargaining theory in a two-stage network DEA

Bargaining game model in the evaluation of decision making units

Efficiency improvement based upon overall value judgment and weight restriction.

A weighting model based on best–worst method and its application for environmental performance evaluation