Abstract:Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.

A cross-efficiency model using bargaining theory in a two-stage network DEA

A compromise programming approach for cross efficiency measurement in basic two-stage network system

Overall Efficiency of Four-Stage Structure with Undesirable Outputs: A New SBM Network DEA Model

Performance evaluation in a two-stage network-DEA with intermediate products

Cross-efficiency evaluation and improvement in two-stage network data envelopment analysis

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Efficiency Decomposition in Two-Stage Network in Data Envelopment Analysis with Undesirable Intermediate Measures and Fuzzy Input and Output

A new cross-efficiency ranking method in group decision making environment

Improved DEA Cross Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points

DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance

A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA

Alternative Secondary Goals in Multiplicative Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

Evaluation of Multi-stage Fuzzy Networks in DEA and DEA-R Based on Liquidity Ratios with Undesirable Outputs

DEA cross-efficiency models with prospect theory and distance entropy: An empirical study on high-tech industries

A new robust DEA model and super-efficiency measure

Sustainability assessment of supply chains by a novel robust two-stage network DEA model: a case study in the transport industry

Evaluation to Fixed-Sum-outputs DMUs by Non-Oriented Equilibrium Efficient Frontier DEA Approach with Nash Bargaining-Based Selection

Improving the evaluation of cross efficiencies: A method based on Shannon entropy weight

Estimating Relative Efficiency of DMU: Pareto Principle and Monte Carlo Oriented DEA Approach.

A slacks-based measure approach for efficiency decomposition in multi-period two-stage systems