Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to highlight the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) techniques in computational docking. The use of smart computational methods in the life cycle of drug design is relatively a recent development that has gained much popularity and interest over the last few years. Central to this methodology is the notion of computational docking which is the process of predicting the best pose (orientation + conformation) of a small molecule (drug candidate) when bound to a target larger receptor molecule (protein) in order to form a stable complex molecule. In computational docking, a large number of binding poses are evaluated and ranked using a scoring function. The scoring function is a mathematical predictive model that produces a score that represents the binding free energy, and hence the stability, of the resulting complex molecule. Generally, such a function should produce a set of plausible ligands ranked according to their binding stability along with their binding poses. In more practical terms, an effective scoring function should produce promising drug candidates which can then be synthesized and physically screened using high throughput screening process. Therefore, the key to computer-aided drug design is the design of an efficient highly accurate scoring function (using ML techniques).METHODS: The methods presented in this paper are specifically based on ML techniques. Despite many traditional techniques have been proposed, the performance was generally poor. Only in the last few years started the application of the ML technology in the design of scoring functions; and the results have been very promising.MATERIAL: The ML-based techniques are based on various molecular features extracted from the abundance of protein-ligand information in the public molecular databases, e.g., protein data bank bind (PDBbind).RESULTS: In this paper, we present this paradigm shift elaborating on the main constituent elements of the ML approach to molecular docking along with the state-of-the-art research in this area. For instance, the best random forest (RF)-based scoring function on PDBbind v2007 achieves a Pearson correlation coefficient between the predicted and experimentally determined binding affinities of 0.803 while the best conventional scoring function achieves 0.644. The best RF-based ranking power ranks the ligands correctly based on their experimentally determined binding affinities with accuracy 62.5% and identifies the top binding ligand with accuracy 78.1%.CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with open questions and potential future research directions that can be pursued in smart computational docking; using molecular features of different nature (geometrical, energy terms, pharmacophore), advanced ML techniques (e.g., deep learning), combining more than one ML models.

Does Machine Learning Learn the Physics for Pose Ranking of Fragment-Sized Ligands? A Comparison between Machine Learning and Physics-based Methods

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Can molecular dynamics simulations improve predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity with machine learning?

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Machine learning in computational docking

How to make machine learning scoring functions competitive with FEP

Uni-Mol Docking V2: Towards Realistic and Accurate Binding Pose Prediction

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and traditional scoring functions

Machine‐learning scoring functions for structure‐based drug lead optimization

From machine learning to deep learning: Advances in scoring functions for protein–ligand docking

Modern Semiempirical Electronic Structure Methods and Machine Learning Potentials for Drug Discovery: Conformers, Tautomers, and Protonation States

Modern machine‐learning for binding affinity estimation of protein–ligand complexes: Progress, opportunities, and challenges

Can Machine Learning Consistently Improve the Scoring Power of Classical Scoring Functions? Insights into the Role of Machine Learning in Scoring Functions.

Physics-Guided Deep Generative Model for New Ligand Discovery

Machine Learning Meets Physics-based Modeling: A Mass-spring System to Predict Protein-ligand Binding Affinity

Binding Affinity Prediction with 3D Machine Learning: Training Data and Challenging External Testing

Comparative analysis of machine learning methods in ligand-based virtual screening of large compound libraries.

Machine learning accelerates MD-based binding pose prediction between ligands and proteins

Predicting Fragment Binding Modes Using Customized Lennard-Jones Potentials in Short Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Leveraging nonstructural data to predict structures and affinities of protein-ligand complexes

A fully differentiable ligand pose optimization framework guided by deep learning and a traditional scoring function