#245 : the Clinical Outcome of Different Embryo Transfer Strategies after Late Rescue ICSI Procedure

Rui Yang,Tian,Xiaxuan Zhu,Rong Li,Ping Liu,Jie Qiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2661318223743953
2023-01-01
Fertility & Reproduction
Abstract:Background and Aims: To evaluate the safety profile and effectiveness of freeze-all blastocyst transfer when applied in the late rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (r-ICSI). All participants reproductive Centre of Peking University Third Hospital received treatment from 2009 to 2019 were included. A total of 2,270 patients met the inclusion criteria who encountered an unexpected total fertilization failure (TFF) during 149,054 cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and adopted a late r-ICSI procedure. Methods: Patients were grouped according to the transfer strategies (926 women in Group 1 performing fresh embryo transfer (ET), 365 women in Group 2 performing freeze-all ET, 716 women in Group 3 experiencing a blastulation failure, and another 263 women without available D3 embryos). Different embryo transfer strategies after r-ICSI procedure. Main outcome measure(s) The live birth rate (LBR), cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), and conservative cLBR. Results: The TFF occurred in 7.4% of all IVF cycles. Group 1 tended to be older at oocyte retrieval [33.00 (30.00-37.00) vs. 31.00 (29.00-35.00), P<0.001], with longer infertile years [5.00 (3.00-8.00) vs. 3.00 (2.00-6.00), P<0.001], higher FSH levels [7.10 (5.71- 8.69) vs. 6.61 (5.25-7.95) mIU/mL, P<0.001], more gonadotropin consumption [2850.00 (1950.00-4125.00) vs. 2325.00 (1800.00-3150.00) IU, P<0.001], and oocytes retrieved were also fewer [10.00 (6.00-15.00) vs. 13.00 (9.00-19.00), P<0.001]. Group 2 has achieved considerably better clinical outcomes both in LBR of the first ET cycle (37.53 vs. 4.64%) and cLBR (52.60 vs. 8.21%). After adjustment for covariates using binary logistic regression analyses, Group 2 was still linked to better obstetric performances in calculations for LBR [OR: 11.77, 95% CI (8.42-16.45)], cLBR [OR: 11.29, 95% CI (7.84-16.27)] and conservative cLBR [OR: 2.55, 95% CI (1.83-3.55)]. Two groups had a similar miscarriage rate, and no newborns with malformations or congenital diseases were reported. Conclusions: Our study highlighted r-ICSI as a safe and effective alternative when frustrated couples came up against unexpected TFF. Freeze-all blastocyst stage ET serves as the optimal strategy for late rescue ICSI. However, regarding women with limited oocytes available for r-ICSI use, weighing the benefits against the cost might be prudent before implementing in vitro blastulation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?