Analysis of clinical outcomes for embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer

Hao Gui-qin,Li Rong,Geng Lan,Xu Jin-bei,Yang Wei-hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2011.31.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND: It is less reported in China about the clinical outcome of cleavage-stage embryo transfer and blastocyst transfer. OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical outcome of the cleavage stage transfer and blastocyst transfer. METHODS:1 612 IVF/ICSI cycles treated in Peking University Shenzhen Hospital between January 2008 and December 2009 were included in the study. It was compared between D2/D3 cleavage stage transfer and D5 blastocyst transfer about clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, abortion rate, multiples and sex ratio of neonatal. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:The cycle number of D2/D3/D5 group was 195, 1162 and 255. The clinical pregnancy rate was 33.33%, 38.04%, 44.71% respectively for three groups. The implantation rate was 21.37%, 24.70%, 31.96%. The clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in D5 group than in D2/3 group (P < 0.05). For ectopic pregnancy, the risk estimate was higher in D2 group than in D3 group. No statistically differences existed in regard to abortion, monozygotic twin, multiples, preterm birth and sex ratio of neonatal among three groups. It was demonstrated a higher pregnancy rate and implantation rate after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage stage transfer. At the same time, the risk of abortion, monozygotic twin, multiples, preterm birth had not increased. It had no adverse effect on the sex ratio of neonatal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?