Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Versus Initial Coin Offerings

Reward-Based Crowdfunding vs. Initial Coin Offering

When to Use Rewards in Charitable Crowdfunding

Pricing Strategies and Mechanism Choice in Reward-Based Crowdfunding.

A Cash‐strapped Creator's Reward‐based Crowdfunding Strategies with Spot Sales

A Distinctive Early Bird Price in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

Keep It or Give Back? Optimal Pricing Strategy of Reward-Based Crowdfunding with a Hybrid Mechanism in the Sharing Economy

Joint Inventory and Rationing Decisions in Reward-Based Crowdfunding.

Crowdfunding: Designing an effective reward structure

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Rethinking investors' herding behavior under the conditions of reward-based crowdfunding platform

Pricing Strategies in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: Whether to Introduce Price Guarantee?

Initial Coin Offerings, Speculation, and Asset Tokenization

Token Sales Design Under Network Effect

Pricing and Advertising for Reward-Based Crowdfunding Products in E-commerce

Consumers as Financiers: Consumer Surplus, Crowdfunding, and Initial Coin Offerings

When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?

Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur

Intermediation in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: a Cash Deposit Mechanism to Reduce Moral Hazard

Bundling and Pricing Strategies in Crowdfunding

The Crowdfunding Effects on Venture Capital Investments