Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

Reward-Based Crowdfunding: The Role of Information Disclosure

Reward-Based Crowdfunding vs. Initial Coin Offering

Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Versus Initial Coin Offerings

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

Information Design in Crowdfunding under Thresholding Policies

Information Disclosure and Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis of the Disclosure of Project Risk

Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard

When to Use Rewards in Charitable Crowdfunding

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Campaigns: Informational Value and Access to Venture Capital

Risk Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Advertising and pricing decisions for signaling crowdfunding product's quality

Advertising and Pricing Decisions for Signaling Crowdfunding Product’s Quality

A Recombinant Framework of Technological Information Disclosure and Reward-Based Crowdfunding Performance of Technology Projects

Signaling Production Quality for Reward-based Crowdfunding under Competition

Crowdfunding Innovative but Risky New Ventures: the Importance of Less Ambiguous Tone

Pricing Strategies in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: Whether to Introduce Price Guarantee?

Signaling and herding in reward-based crowdfunding

How to capitalize on investors by using information presentation and feedback on crowdfunding projects

The Value of Crowdfunding: an Explanation Based on Demand Uncertainty and Comparison with Venture Capital

Let others know who your friends are: The effect of collaborator disclosure on crowdfunding performance