Information Disclosure and Crowdfunding: an Empirical Analysis of the Disclosure of Project Risk

Keongtae Kim,Jooyoung Park,Yang Pan,Kunpeng Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.12360abstract

2017-01-01

Abstract:The information asymmetry between creators and backers is a key concern of crowdfunding platform providers. They often implement platform-wide rules in an effort to reduce this concern. This paper combines multiple empirical methods (i.e., a differences-in-difference design, online experiments, and a machine learning method with text mining) to estimate the impact on the behavior of market participants of a crowdfunding platform’s requirement for the disclosure of project risk. We find that fewer projects, and even fewer successful ones, are launched after implementation of such a disclosure policy. The effect is stronger for creators bearing higher disclosure costs in technology projects, whereas we do not see any significant difference in non- technology projects across different creators. We also observe negative responses of backers to the new policy, and show similar, contrasting effects on backing between technology and non-technology projects. The source of disclosure and the content and presentation of disclosed information are valuable for backers in technology categories but not for those backers of non-technology. Overall, our study has implications for disclosure policies in crowd-based marketplaces and guidance for market participants.