Abstract:Problem definition: This paper studies an entrepreneur’s pricing strategy in a reward-based crowdfunding campaign under asymmetric product quality information. We propose two signaling mechanisms and investigate how entrepreneurs can leverage their pricing strategy to signal a high-quality project. Academic/practical relevance: This problem is relevant to practice, as asymmetric quality information is a significant concern in reward-based crowdfunding. High-quality entrepreneurs seek credible mechanisms to signal the quality of projects to customers. Methodology: We develop a stylized game-theoretic signaling model with funding and regular selling periods that captures asymmetric quality information between an entrepreneur and customers. Results: We propose a new theory on quality signaling in crowdfunding. We show that contingent access to the regular selling market after running a successful crowdfunding campaign allows high-quality entrepreneurs to signal their quality through low funding prices (one-price signaling). A high-quality entrepreneur can increase his funding price and still signal his high-quality level if he commits to the future regular selling price (two-price signaling). We show that the distinct feature of crowdfunding, that is, the probabilistic nature of crowdfunding, plays different roles in one- and two-price signaling. It is the driving force for the separating equilibrium in one-price signaling, and in two-price signaling, it affects how the entrepreneur should manipulate his funding and regular selling prices to reduce signaling cost. Managerial implications: Entrepreneurs should be mindful of pricing in funding and regular selling periods because it could play an essential role in signaling quality information. Our findings suggest practical tools for quality signaling in crowdfunding. We also investigate when price commitment is the most beneficial for a high-quality entrepreneur, looking for potential signaling mechanisms. Funding: W. Zhou acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant 72192823 and Grant 71821002]. Supplemental Material: The online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1177 .

(Crowd)Funding Innovation: Financing Constraints, Price Discrimination and Welfare

Reward-Based Crowdfunding Versus Initial Coin Offerings

Reward-Based Crowdfunding vs. Initial Coin Offering

LARGE CROWDS OR LARGE INVESTMENTS? HOW SOCIAL IDENTITY INFLUENCES THE COMMITMENT OF THE CROWD

Does Crowdfunding Benefit Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital Investors?

Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing

When crowdfunding meets bank financing: Substitute or supplement?

Crowdfunding Under Market Feedback, Asymmetric Information And Overconfident Entrepreneur

Combinatorial Civic Crowdfunding with Budgeted Agents: Welfare Optimality at Equilibrium and Optimal Deviation

The Hidden Cost of Accommodating Crowdfunder Privacy Preferences: A Randomized Field Experiment

Quality and Pricing Decisions for Reward-based Crowdfunding: Effects of Moral Hazard

Product and Pricing Decisions in Crowdfunding

Intermediation in Reward-Based Crowdfunding: a Cash Deposit Mechanism to Reduce Moral Hazard

The Crowdfunding Game

New product financing decision: Crowdfunding, bank or supply chain?

The One-Shot Crowdfunding Game

Strategic Pricing and Information Disclosure in Crowdfunding

Joint Decisions On Production And Pricing With Strategic Consumers For Green Crowdfunding Products

Operational analysis of crowdfunding on business: A perspective of product competition

Reward-Based Crowdfunding: The Role of Information Disclosure

Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions