A Bounding-Surface-based Cyclic "P-Y Plus M-θ" Model for Unified Description of Laterally Loaded Piles with Different Failure Modes in Clay

Yi Hong,Xuanyu Chen,Lizhong Wang,Lilin Wang,Ben He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2023-0310
IF: 3.6
2024-01-01
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Abstract:The increasing turbine sizes have necessitated monopiles in soft clay to have larger diameter and rigidity, from early design of flexible piles to recent semi-rigid piles, with future anticipating rigid piles. Existing few cyclic soil-pile interaction models are developed for flexible pile associated with full-flow failure (above the rotation point, RP), with little attention paid to semi-rigid and rigid piles involving rotational-shear failure (below RP). This study aims to unify the description of piles with varying rigidity by proposing a cyclic two-spring model, where lateral resistances above and below RP are described with cyclic p-y and M-θ springs, respectively. It naturally recovers to a cyclic p-y model for flexible piles. The cyclic p-y and M-θ formulations are developed within the bounding-surface plasticity framework, based on numerical results of cyclic soil-pile interaction concerning full-flow and rotational-shear mechanisms, respectively. These numerical analyses are performed using a cyclic plasticity clay model developed and implemented numerically in this study. The cyclic ‘p-y+M-θ’ model quantitatively reproduces experimental results of cyclic shakedown and ratcheting for flexible, semi-rigid and rigid piles. Ignorance of the M-θ spring could under-estimate cyclic resistance of rigid piles by 25%, suggesting the model’s merit in reducing conservatism for monopiles in feature designs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?