Abstract:We reply to the Comment by Schirmacher et al. [Phys. Rev. E, 106, 066101 (2022)PREHBM2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.106.066101]. We disagree that the heat capacity of liquids is not a mystery since a widely accepted theoretical derivation based on simple physical assumptions is still missing. We also disagree about the lack of evidence for a linear in frequency scaling of the liquid density of states, which is indeed reported in uncountable simulations and recently also in experiments. We emphasize that our theoretical derivation does not assume any Debye density of states. We agree that such an assumption would be incorrect. Finally, we remark that the Bose-Einstein distribution naturally tends to the Boltzmann distribution in the classical limit, which makes our results valid also for classical liquids. We hope that this scientific exchange will bring more attention to the description of the vibrational density of states and thermodynamics of liquids, which still present many open puzzles.

Response to “comment on ‘the Hyperpolarizability of Trans-Butadiene: A Critical Test Case for Quantum Chemical Models’ ” [J. Chem. Phys. 108, 4355 (1998)]

The Hyperpolarizability of Trans-Butadiene: A Critical Test Case for Quantum Chemical Models

Response to Comment on "Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas"

Ab Initio Calculations of the Polarizability and the Hyperpolarizability of C60

Response to "Response to 'Comment on Theoretical examination of QED Hamiltonian in relativistic molecular orbital theory'" [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)]

Reply to 'Comment on "Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes"'

Response to Comment on “Density functional theory is straying from the path toward the exact functional”

Response to Comment on Ultradense protium p(0) and deuterium D(0) and their relation to ordinary Rydberg matter: a review [Physica Scripta 94 (2019) 075005]

Comment on "High Precision Measurement of the Thermal Exponent for the three-dimensional XY Universality Class"

Reply to the Comment of den Hartog and van Wees on "Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples"

Reply to the Comment, <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="0810.3243v1" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3243v1">arXiv:0810.3243v1</a> by B. Geyer, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and. V. M. Mostepanenko

Comment on: "Toward Accurate Two-Photon Absorption Spectrum Simulations: Exploring the Landscape beyond the Generalized Gradient Approximation"

Gao et al. Reply

Comment on "Macroscopic surface charges from microscopic simulations" [J. Chem. Phys. 153, 164709 (2020)]

Ground- and Excited-State Hyperpolarizabilities of Cis-, Trans- and Diphenyl-Polyenes

Reply to "Comment on 'Explaining the specific heat of liquids based on instantaneous normal modes'"

Geometrical Effect on the First Hyperpolarizability of Thiophene-Substituted Stilbene Derivatives

Comment on “Quantifying hot carrier and thermal contributions in plasmonic photocatalysis”

A comparison of density-functional-theory and coupled-cluster frequency-dependent polarizabilities and hyperpolarizabilities

Response Theory for Static and Dynamic Polarizabilities of Excited States

The hyperpolarizability dispersion of para-nitroaniline