Abstract:Leadership responsibility is a general term for all forms of responsibilities a leader should take in his execution of leadership duties. It can be categorized into two forms: non-legal responsibility (that is, political responsibility), which is a manifestation of being responsible for one's political activity against public will, and legal responsibility, which can be classified into administrative responsibility, civil responsibility, and criminal responsibility, in accordance with the nature of illegal activities. Whether an administrative leader should take administrative responsibility depends on whether his activities run counter to administrative leadership duties. These duties, in real situations, largely originate from self-prescribed administrative rules and regulations and administrative responsibility pledges by various departments, in addition to norms of the constitution, laws, statutes, and provisions. Although manifested in a variety of forms, they generally rely on appropriate balance of interests, equitable distribution of resources, proper concern for procedures, and regular operation of organizations, with the implementation of administrative discretion as its nature. Therefore, leaders' administrative responsibility must be measured by the standard of activities that go against administrative leadership duties, and by drawing a correct line between appropriate discretion activities and illegal activities. Accordingly, illegal administrative leadership activities can be further categorized into two forms: abuse of and negligence of exercising administrative leadership. The former can be further specified in five aspects: the purpose of carrying out administrative leadership activities runs counter to the legislative intention of empowering administrative leadership duties; the implementation of administrative leadership activities fails to take relevant interests into full consideration; the implementation is a move of shifting administrative leadership duties; the executed administrative leadership activities go against the principle of proportionality in administrative law; and the implementation of administrative leadership activities violates the principle of equal treatment. The latter includes the empowering of discretion to a third party, the belief of non-discretion, the inappropriate restraint of policies, and the inappropriate restraint of orders from above, etc.

The Constituent Elements for the Implementation of Administrative Responsibility

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

On the Constitution Normative Foundation of the Legitimacy of Administrative Procedure

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Realization of Corporate Social Responsibility:Its Mechanism Construction and Analysis

Legislative Perfection of Administration Responsibility System

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

On the Meaning and Basis of Administrative Accountability

Key features of administrative responsibility

On Precise Ascertainment of Administrative Leaderships' Administrative Responsibility

Positive Interaction Between Administrative Proceeding and the Constitutional Government from the Perspective of Public Law

Reasons and countermeasures to enhance the construction of administrative law enforcement

On the Administrative Liability and Its Legal Remedies of EU

The Essential Constituents of a Lawful Administrative Action

The Constitution with Characteristics of Administrative Law

Legal Control on Administrative Investigation

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation