Debate between Worthless Behavior and Worthless Result in Japanese Criminal Law and Chinese Choice
FU Li-qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8860.2013.01.019
2013-01-01
Abstract:In the theories concerning criminal law,there has been the debate between worthless behavior and worthless result.Japanese scholars in criminal law have influenced their Chinese counterparts.The discussion in China is centered on the current legislative regulations,which criticizes the current theory of four necessary conditions in terms of the establishment of a crime,and is of distinct historical and academic features.The Chinese scholars in criminal law must accept theories concerning worthless results for four reasons: first,the illegality of formal breaching means behavioral violation of actual laws;second,in the context of the so-called illegal dichotomy,in the judgment of illegality,worthless result and worthless behavior should receive equal consideration;third,on the occasion when judging whether certain behavior is illegal,the insistence on worthless behavior,whether it is purposeful or neglect,or responsible capability,such behavior becomes the object of judgment,thus making the accountable behavior unnecessary;fourth,the insistence on worthless result as the sole criterion can also solve the issue of illegal property.