Abstract:The United States uses the "entity list" system and other measures to eliminate China from the high-end industrial chain based on its technological hegemony, in order to weaken technological competitiveness of China. Coupled with the impact of high tariffs, it forces some of Chinese industries to move overseas to a certain extent, touching the bottom line of China’s security and even the global supply chain. The trade and flow of technology and products are based on commercial behavior. It has constituted a "long arm jurisdiction" beyond the scope of national sovereignty by unilaterally restricting the flow of technology for political purposes. The technology regulation under the "long arm jurisdiction" of the United States does cause the problem of technology bottlenecks to China. This paper attempts to analyze the causes of the above problems from the institutional level. From the perspective of external factors, the western countries led by the United States use technological sovereignty to exercise technological hegemony and use technological control measures to exercise "long arm jurisdiction". In terms of internal factors, the Chinese enterprises are short of subjective estimation and there are objectively insufficient incentives for fundamental research by the property right mechanism in China. Technological hegemony can go beyond the "wall" built by multilateralism to curb the scientific and technological development and technological flow of specific countries, and China has become its primary "sniper" target. Chinese enterprises embrace globalization, but to a certain extent, they ignore the harm of "anti-globalization" and the devastating impact of technological constraints on the survival of enterprises. This paper proposes that China should first counter it through domestic legislation, and China has actually adopted the list system of unreliable entities and blocking methods. On this basis, China has formulated the anti-foreign sanctions law and the export control law. The anti-foreign sanctions law not only constructs the extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction in the field of public law, but also endows the private subject with the right to sue for civil compensation. It is necessary for China to coordinate and amend the foreign trade law and the export control law, and incorporate the non-traditional security concept into them to form a unified national security exception clause. It has made principled provisions on the localization transplantation of the American "Bayh-Dole Act" in China in the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Scientific and Technological Progress, but the reality has led to the dilemma of its localization application. There is an urgent need to communicate between academia and industry about the improvement of the incentive mechanism of basic research needs. The innovation of this paper is that the introduction of civil public interest litigation can overcome the problem of "tragedy of the commons" in the application of the anti-foreign sanctions law, so Chinese enterprises can avoid from offending enterprises in the industrial chain that comply with the U.S. sanctions plan. Adjusting the novelty grace period system in China’s patent law can open up the path of property right of technical documents, provide effective incentives for industry, and will not directly interfere with the scientific autonomy of academia. It not only ensures the scientific autonomy of the academic community and reduces the conflict between knowledge privatization and innovation culture, but also provides rich sources of technology that can be property rights for the industrial community. The industrial community and the academic community virtually form a rational joint force to solve problems in a certain field of science and Engineering Technology.From the research of this paper, we can draw the following conclusions. There are contradictions in the US technology restriction measures. Adhering to the concept of community of human destiny, China should adopt an active and open national innovation system, deeply integrate the industrial chain with the world, actively reshape the global science and technology and trade systems and finally win the "science and technology war".

WTO Rules and the Completion of Policies and Regulations of Defense Science and Technology

Influences on Selection Policies of Agriculture Protection for Entry WTO

Cross-border higher education in China in the globalized world: The perspective of the World Trade Organization's General Agreement on Trade in Services

China and WTO: Retrospect and Prospect in Perspective of Globalization

Research on the Policy Vicissitude and Growth Environment for China's Agricultural Foreign Trade

On Legislations to Protect the Agricultural Resources and Environment of China under the Framework of WTO

The Impact of Entry into the WTO on China's Technology Introduction--from the Change of Multinational's Investment Strategy in China

Chinese agriculture after the WTO accession: Competitiveness and policy

China’s Law Diplomacy——Theory and Practice

The Influence of China's Export Trade on Technical Barriers to Trade and the Countermeasures

The Impacts of China's Accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) on China's Energy Sector

Recarding the issue of the competitiveness of Chinese agriculture after the accession to WTO | Zur Frage der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Landwirtschaft Chinas nach dem WTO-Beitritt

China and the WTO: From Difficult Access to Partial Leadership

China’s arms trade: trends and challenges

WTO and Chinese Land & Resources Management

Some Issues on the R&D of China's IT Lndustry

On Reform of Chinese IP System under the WTO Laws

On the Changes of Chinese Legal System for Implementing the WTO Laws

Research on the Current Dilemma and Breakthrough Path of China's International Economic and Trade Rules for Elevation Standards

Institutional Causes,Legal Response and International Governance of Technology Regulation under"Long Arm Jurisdiction"

Three Changes Not Foreseen by WTO Rules Framers Twenty-Five Years Ago