Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

My Humble Opinions on Some Basic Theoretical Problems of Administrative Contracts

The Analysis of the Circulation of the Operation Right to Contractual Land

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Research on the Issue of Administrative Agreement

Rethinking Administrative Subcontract:Reply

Explanation of the Contract Meaning of Administrative Law

Theoretical Examination and Systematic Reconstruction on Mediation of Administrative Litigation in China

On Basic Problems About Labor Contract Law

New Interpretation in the Concepts of Administration and Administrative Law

Glancing back Theoretical Foundation of Administrative Law : Evolution Of a Holism

The Status Quo, Problems and Construction of the System of Administrative Action Null and Void in China

Revolutionary Innovation of Administrative Law——Review on Road to Transforming Administrative Law in China:Establishment and Extension of Contract Idea by Professor Yang Jiejun

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

The analysis on economic administrative law

Another Remarkable Work Which Push Administrative Rule by Law in China--On BASIC THEORY RESEARCH ON CHINESE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW written by Yang Hai - kun and Zhang Zhi - yuan

The Implement of Administrative Contract in the Domain of Environmental Regulation

The Systematization and the Reform of Administrative Law Theory in China

New Exploration on the Concept of Administrative Legal Liability

The Analysis of the Current Research Situation of the Theory of Administrative Planning in China