Assessing fatigue crack growth thresholds for a Ti-6Al-4V (STOA) alloy using two experimental methods
Aniket Mote,Thomas E. Lacy,James C. Newman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110006
IF: 5.4
2024-03-07
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
Abstract:Fatigue crack growth rate behavior in the threshold and near-threshold regimes for a Ti-6Al-4V solution-treated and over-aged (STOA) alloy was investigated using two test procedures: i ) accelerated load reduction (ALR) utilizing faster load-shed rates than recommended in the ASTM standard E647 load-reduction (LR) test procedure, and ii ) compression pre-cracking constant-amplitude (CPCA) or load-increasing (CPLI) and load-reduction (CPLR). Fatigue crack growth tests were conducted on compact, C(T), specimens (B = 6.35 mm) with two different widths ( W = 51 and 76 mm) at two stress ratios ( R = 0.1 and 0.7). The crack-growth-rate test data were compared to previous test data produced from the same batch of material using the ASTM LR and CPCA test procedures that were tested on C(T) specimens ( W = 25, 51 and 76 mm) over a wide range in stress ratios (R = 0.1, 0.4, and 0.7). Although none of the load-reduction test procedures provided a good representation of the threshold value (Δ K th ) at low R , the CPCA test procedure was the most promising. The LR, ALR, and CPLR test procedures were influenced by prior loading history, leading to higher Δ K th values and slower crack growth rates in the threshold regime due to a rise in the crack-opening loads. The LR and ALR tests at R = 0.1 and shed rates of −0.08, −0.32, and −0.95 mm −1 yielded Δ K th values that were 15 to 38 % higher than the estimated threshold stress-intensity factor range (Δ K * th ) R =0.1 based on the crack-closure model (FASTRAN). The compression pre–cracking test procedures are more accurate alternatives for developing threshold and near-threshold fatigue crack growth rates. Specifically, the CPLR test procedure produced a Δ K th value that was 8–18 % higher than (Δ K * th ) R =0.1 . Additionally, LR and ALR tests produced different Δ K th values as a function of the specimen width for a given load ratio, which violates classical fracture mechanics principles. In addition, the spread in the Δ K -rate data in the low-rate regime was larger than the spread in the mid-rate regime as a function of R , a term referred to as " fanning ". In contrast, the CPCA test procedure produced consistent crack growth rates over the same range of Δ K values examined, independent of the specimen width and these data did not exhibit " fanning " with R . Further research is necessary to develop standard test procedures capable of providing a more definitive representation of the Δ K th value in the threshold regime. However, FASTRAN can serve as a crucial tool in aligning the actual Δ K th values with those obtained through CP testing, thereby bridging the gap and enhancing the reliability of the results.
mechanics