Cross-talk between transcription factors AhR and Nrf2: lessons for cancer chemoprevention from dioxin.
J. Hayes,A. Dinkova-Kostova,M. McMahon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp168
2009-10-01
Toxicological Sciences
Abstract:Throughout life, humans are subjected episodically to numerous stressors, including ultraviolet irradiation, products of combustion, pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, and other environmental pollutants, as well as various toxicants ingested in food, such as phytochemicals in edible plants; pyrolysis products in cooked meat; and mycotoxin contaminants in cereals, nuts, and maize. To ensure survival in the face of such challenges, mammalian cells have evolved a variety of inducible genetic programs that enable them to adapt to the presence of harmful xenobiotics. These programs entail upregulation of discrete batteries of genes for drug-metabolizing enzymes, drug transporters, and various cytoprotective proteins that allow an increased rate of xenobiotic elimination from the body, restoration of normal homeostasis, and removal of damaged macromolecules. Among transcription factors that mediate adaptation to foreign compounds, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and nuclear factor-erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) have been widely studied. It is well established that the AhR is responsible for induction by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) of genes that contain a xenobiotic response element (XRE, also sometimes called a dioxin response element) in their promoter regions. It is also clear that Nrf2 is responsible for induction by structurally diverse electrophiles and quinones of genes that contain an antioxidant response element (ARE, also sometimes called an electrophile response element) in their promoter regions. For many years, the pathways leading to induction of XRE-driven genes and induction of ARE-driven genes were thought to be entirely separate. In particular, TCDD was assumed to activate transcription essentially only through the XRE. In the highlighted paper, however, Klaassen and colleagues have presented strong in vivo evidence that TCDD can stimulate cross-talk between AhR and Nrf2, insofar that they have demonstrated induction by dioxin of numerous mouse glutathione S-transferase (Gst) genes that are not known to contain functional XREs in their upstream regulatory regions (Yeager et al., 2009). The ability of compounds such as TCDD and PAHs to induce the expression of members of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A family with aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity, and thereby increase the rate of metabolism of aromatic xenobiotics, has been known for at least 40 years. Activation of CYP genes by TCDD or PAH is mediated by AhR, a ligandactivated transcription factor that is a member of the basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim family (Gu et al., 2000). The AhR is normally retained in the cytoplasm in a complex with heat-shock protein 90, ARA9, and p23, and upon ligand binding, it translocates to the nucleus where it is recruited to XRE sequences in the promoters of target genes as a heterodimer with AhR nuclear translocator, another basic helix-loop-helix/Per-Arnt-Sim family member (Gu et al., 2000). Figure 1 shows the structures of TCDD along with the PAHs benzo[a]pyrene and 3-methylcholanthrene, the flavonoids b-naphthoflavone and quercetin, and the planar phytochemical indolo[3,2-b]carbazole, all of which serve as ligands for the AhR (Nguyen and Bradfield, 2008). In the mouse, the classic AhR target genes are Cyp1a1, Cyp1a2, Cyp1b1, aldehyde dehydrogenase 3a1 (Aldh3a1), Gst alpha 1 (Gsta1), NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (Nqo1), and UDP-glucuronosyl transferase 1a6 (Ugt1a6). Recognition that oxidizable polyphenols and a diverse range of thiol-reactive soft electrophiles induce drug-metabolizing enzymes has its origins in the cancer chemoprevention field. From the mid-1970’s onwards, agents that inhibit chemical carcinogenesis, such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), ethoxyquin, oltipraz, and sulforaphane, were found in the mouse to upregulate microsomal epoxide hydrolase, Gsta1, Gsta2, Gsta3, Gsta4, Gstm1, Gstm2, Gstm3, Gstm4, Gstp1, Gstp2, and Nqo1 (reviewed by Hayes et al., 2005; Holtzclaw et al., 2004). As some of the genes that are induced by BHA are also induced by TCDD, it was initially a matter of some controversy as to whether they are regulated in an AhR-independent manner. However, it is now accepted that Nrf2, 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: þ44 (0)1382 669993. E-mail: j.d.hayes@dundee.ac.uk.