Development and Validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) for Chinese

Yanan He,Jiuqing Tang,Xinghai Yang,Song Zj,Ning Ding,Jia Yao,Liu Li,Jingjing Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/taz6s
2023-01-01
Abstract:The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is a popular instrument for diagnosing dyslexia in adults, yet there is no evidence to suggest its applicability in Chinese. The aim of the present study is to develop an Adult Reading History Questionnaire for Chinese (Chinese-ARHQ) and to assess its validity among Chinese adults. A total of 2439 questionnaires were collected, with 2234 usable for further analyses (Nmales = 825,Mage = 26.29 years, SD = 9.12). Among them, 184 completed the questionnaire twice, and 221 completed reading-related tests. Results showed that the Chinese-ARHQ had a good reliability. Cronbach's reliability α was 0.88 and the test-retest reliability was 0.81. Three subscales (current reading, dyslexia symptom, and memory) were extracted from exploratory factor analysis. Scores of the Chinese-ARHQ and its subscales were both related to reading and phonological skills, revealing criterion validity of the questionnaire. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal threshold of the Chinese-ARHQ was 0.36 with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 75.9%. Additionally, adults with reading difficulty (Chinese-ARHQ ≥ 0.36) performed worse than controls on reading accuracy and phonological awareness, which further validated the Chinese-ARHQ as a reliable self-report screening tool for Chinese dyslexia in adults.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?