Value of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Estimating Histological Grade of Vesical Urothelial Carcinoma

H.J. Wang,Margaret H. Pui,Yan Guo,S.R. Li,M.J. Liu,Jian Guan,X.L. Zhang,Yanqiu Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.03.001
IF: 3.389
2014-01-01
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:To compare the efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized ADC (nADC) for estimating the histological grade of vesical urothelial carcinoma and to identify an optimal reference for nADC calculation.Thirty patients with histologically confirmed vesical urothelial carcinomas underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of the pelvis. nADC of the tumour was calculated as ADC (tumour)/ADC (reference) using urine in the bladder lumen, and the obturator internus and gluteus maximus muscles as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to identify an optimal reference for nADC calculation.Both ADC and nADC of low-grade tumours (1.112 ± 0.159 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 0.403 ± 0.047 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than those of high-grade tumours (0.772 ± 0.091 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, 0.276 ± 0.033 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The area under the nADC ROC curve using urine as reference was significantly (p = 0.000) larger (0.995) than those using obturator internus (0.960) and gluteus maximus (0.945).nADC is superior to ADC for estimating the histological grade of bladder carcinoma using urine in the bladder lumen as an optimal reference for nADC calculation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?