Abstract:Objective:This work aims to explore the clinical value of conventional MRI combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas.Methods:Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data obtained from 68 patients with meningioma [(29 males and 39 females, aged 24-78 (48.62±10.28) years] in the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China from January 2018 to August 2019. Among these patients, 52 had WHO grade Ⅰ meningioma (low grade group), 12 had WHO grade Ⅱ, and 4 had WHO grade Ⅲ(high grade group). All patients underwent routine MRI and diffusion weighted imaging(DWI) examination prior to their operation. Comparison of MRI signs, diffusion-weighted imaging characteristics, ADC values of meningioma parenchyma and peritumoral edema, and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC) of tumor parenchyma and contralateral white matter was conducted between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of best rADC values for low- and high-grade meningiomas.Results:No statistical difference was found in the baseline data of the two groups (all P values>0.05). High-grade meningioma presents a high occurrence frequency of these imaging signs, such as irregularity on tumor edge, uneven enhancement, marginal edema, meningeal tail and cyst changes, necrosis, and calcification, and the differences reached a statistical significance (all P values<0.05). Among the cases of low-grade meningioma, 32 showed equal signals on DWI and ADC, and 14 showed slightly high signal on DWI and slightly low signal on ADC. Sixteen cases of high-grade meningioma showed high signal on DWI, cystic changes, hemorrhagic necrosis, and calcified areas but low signal on ADC. The ADC and rADC values of the parenchyma of low-grade meningioma were (0.94±0.14)×10 -3 and (1.16±0.18)×10 -3 mm 2/s, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of high-grade meningioma at (0.73±0.11)×10 -3 and (0.95±0.14)×10 -3 mm 2/s, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=5.491, 4.277, all P values<0.01). The ADC and rADC values of the peritumoral edema area of low-grade meningioma were (1.82±0.19)×10 -3 and (2.29±0.24)×10 -3 mm 2/s, respectively, those of high-grade meningioma were (1.88±0.21)×10 -3 and (2.38±0.29)×10 -3 mm 2/s, respectively, no significant differences were observed between two groups (all P values>0.05). The best critical points for diagnosing low- and high-grade meningiomas were rADC value of 1.035×10 -3 mm 2/s, sensitivity of 88.5%, and a specificity of 87.5%. Conclusions:Conventional MRI combined with DWI ADC value has important clinical value for the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas.

Application of apparent diffusion coefficient ratio in the diagnosis of bladder cancer grading pre-operation

The correlation between diffusion weighted imaging with cervical cancer cell proliferation activity of PCNA and Ki-67

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

The Role of Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

Diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coefficient of magnetic resonance imaging in grading of prostate cancer

The value of apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of cervical cancer

Application of R2* and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Estimating Tumor Grade and T Category of Bladder Cancer.

The differential diagnosis of malignant and benign bladder neoplasm using diffusion-weighted MR imaging

A Comparative Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases Using DWI Apparent Diffusion Coeffi-Cient and the Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

The role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of bladder urothelial cancer

Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score

Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.

Value of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Estimating Histological Grade of Vesical Urothelial Carcinoma

The application of apparent diffusion coefficients derived from intratumoral and peritumoral zones for assessing pathologic prognostic factors in rectal cancer

Application of apparent diffusion coefficient of MRI diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of low- and high-grade meningiomas

Value of apparent diffusion coeff icient to differentiate prostate cancer in central gland from benign prostate hyperplasia

Value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of prostate cancer

Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer

Application Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Different Histological Subtypes of Lung Cancers

Predicting Preoperative Pathologic Grades of Bladder Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Amide Proton Transfer-Weighted Imaging

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps Obtained from High B Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Preoperative Evaluation of Gliomas at 3T: Comparison with Standard B Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging