Robotic-assisted Right Upper Lobectomy: with the Further Research, Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Will Be Better in Future

Hong Du,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.56

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript entitled “Robotic-assisted right upper lobectomy” (1).

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe: Advantage of Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Hong Du,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.80

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript entitled “Robotic thoracic surgery: S1+2 segmentectomy of the left upper lobe” (1). An advantage of robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is that the robotic arms are flexible and allow the surgeon to move instruments freely inside the chest cavity as needed without geometric limitations. Compared with single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the flexibility is one of the primary advantages of robotic surgery. Although the literature revealed that RATS does not seem to offer any advantages over VATS with regards to complications, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and oncological outcome for early-stage lung cancer (2,3), the benefit of RATS is that the surgeon feels more comfortable and confident when performing RATS.
Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Promising Tool Should Not Be Denied

Han Wu,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.68

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript (1). A robotic system has been used in thoracic surgery for more than 10 years, and the technique has matured and become common practice in many institutions.
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: there is a long way to go

Chengqiang Li,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.81

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the reviewer’s excellent comments regarding robotic-assisted thoracoscopic S6 segmentectomy (1). We agree that there is no standardized technique for the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, but without a doubt, the future of surgery is going in the direction of single port access and robotics.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Promising Surgical Method

Sheng Yang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.57

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Jules Lin on our article “ Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: right inferior lobectomy ” (1). Your comments were valuable and helpful in improving our paper. We have studied your comments carefully and have made the suggested corrections, which we hope will meet with your approval. Our responses to your comments are below.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: There is a Long Way to Go.

Cheng-qiang Li,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.81

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the reviewer’s excellent comments regarding robotic-assisted thoracoscopic S6 segmentectomy (1). We agree that there is no standardized technique for the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, but without a doubt, the future of surgery is going in the direction of single port access and robotics.
Robotic Left Lower Lobectomy: Our Experience

Rui Jin,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.55

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We very much appreciate the reviewer’s positive comments and constructive critiques (1), which were valuable in guiding development of our minimally invasive surgical methods. We have addressed all of the comments and provided our point-by-point responses below:
Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: from Laparoscopic Surgery to Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System

Zhang Yuhua,Hong Defei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2015.11.020

2015-01-01

Abstract:From the first Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in 1994 to the first Da Vinci robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy(RPD) in 2003, minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has achieved a breakthrough after 20-year exploration and development.It is a well-established procedure for periampullary carcinomas in some specialized centers now.Some outstanding reports including large clinical trials more than 100 cases of L/RPD in a single center and review analysis about the short and long outcomes between L/RPD and open PD for large cases have been published.For the sake of increasing popularity and acceptance of L/RPD, it is very important for researchers to update the current status of L/RPD and summarize experience and development.
Reply to comments on “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”: incision positions, approaches and other problems

Xingshi Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.45

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Wael C. Hanna from Canada (1) and Dr. Abbas E. Abbas from America (2) on our article “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”. In this article, we described our experience with robotic assisted right middle lobectomy through a specific case (3). As both Dr. Hanna and Dr. Abbas mentioned in their insightful comments, they preferred to line up all of the robotic ports in the same intercostal space (8 th intercostal space) to minimize postoperative pain. In robot-assisted thoracic surgery, the incision positions are flexible and their placement primarily depends on the practice and preference of the surgeon. Many surgeons place the ports in multiple locations in the intercostal space (4-6). Another important factor that we could not ignore is racial difference. Caucasians have wider chests than Chinese; the Chinese chest surface is 93% of the chest surface of Caucasians (7).
Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Liping Zeng,Tianyu He,Jian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.128714

2023-01-01

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Abstract:Minimally invasive techniques have been widely applied in general thoracic surgery. Compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), due to its theoretic superiority, robotic surgery is challenging the traditional position of VATS. With its unique advantages, including 3D vision and a high-freedom endowrist, it leads to easier lymph node dissection, more convenient blood vessel dissection, a shorter learning curve and competence for the completion of complex surgery. However, as a new surgical technology, the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) still need to be further verified. Thus, in this article, we review and summarize the application of RATS versus VATS in general thoracic surgery.
Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Zhehao He,Liping Zeng,Chong Zhang,Luming Wang,Zhitian Wang,Azmat Rustam,Chengli Du,Wang Lv,Jian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.09.11

2017-01-01

Journal of Visualized Surgery

Abstract:Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a relatively new but rapidly adopted technique, pioneered by the urological and gynecological departments. The primary objective of this study is to present the current status, a series of improvement and innovation of Da Vinci robotic surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. In addition, we discuss the prospect of robotic surgical technology.
Reply to Comments on "robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy": Incision Positions, Approaches and Other Problems.

Xingshi Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.45

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Wael C. Hanna from Canada (1) and Dr. Abbas E. Abbas from America (2) on our article “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”. In this article, we described our experience with robotic assisted right middle lobectomy through a specific case (3). As both Dr. Hanna and Dr. Abbas mentioned in their insightful comments, they preferred to line up all of the robotic ports in the same intercostal space (8 th intercostal space) to minimize postoperative pain. In robot-assisted thoracic surgery, the incision positions are flexible and their placement primarily depends on the practice and preference of the surgeon. Many surgeons place the ports in multiple locations in the intercostal space (4-6). Another important factor that we could not ignore is racial difference. Caucasians have wider chests than Chinese; the Chinese chest surface is 93% of the chest surface of Caucasians (7).
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Cost and Lymph Node Dissection

Jie Xiang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.46

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Turner and Dr. Molena (1). All of your comments were valuable and helpful in improving our paper. We have studied your comments carefully and have made the suggested corrections, which we hope will meet with your approval. Our responses to your comments are below.
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Current Technique and Outcomes

Liang Wang,Benjamin R Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12177

2013-01-01

International Journal of Urology

Abstract:AbstractOver the past decade, management of the T1 renal mass has focused on nephron‐sparing surgery. Robotic partial nephrectomy has played an increasing role in the technique of preserving renal function by decreasing warm ischemia time, as well as optimizing outcomes of hemorrhage and fistula. Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy is designed to provide a minimally‐invasive nephron‐sparing surgical option utilizing reconstructive capability, decreasing intracorporeal suturing time, technical feasibility and safety. Ultimately, its benefits are resulting in its dissemination across institutions. Articulated instrumentation and three‐dimensional vision facilitate resection, collecting system reconstruction and renorrhaphy, leading to decreased warm ischemia time while preserving oncological outcomes. The aim of the present review was to present our surgical sequence and technique, as well as review the current status of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy.
Approaches and outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review

Giovanni Mattioni,Alessandro Palleschi,Paolo Mendogni,Davide Tosi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01512-8

2022-12-22

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Abstract:Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) is considered one of the main issues of present thoracic surgery. RATS is a minimally invasive surgical technique allowing enhanced view, accurate and complex movements, and high ergonomics for the surgeon. Despite these advantages, its application in lung procedures has been limited, mainly by its costs. Since now many different approaches have been proposed and the experience in RATS for lungs ranges from wedge resection to pneumonectomy and is mainly related to lung cancer. The present narrative review explores main approaches and outcomes of RATS lobectomy for lung cancer. A non-systematic review of literature was conducted using the PubMed search engine. An overview of lung robotic surgery is given, and main approaches of robotic lobectomy for lung cancer are exposed. Initial experiences of biportal and uniportal RATS are also described. So far, retrospective analysis reported satisfactory robotic operative outcomes, and comparison with VATS might suggest a more accurate lymphadenectomy. Some Authors might even suggest better perioperative outcomes too. From an oncological standpoint, no definitive prospective study has yet been published but several retrospective analyses report oncological outcomes comparable to those of VATS and open surgery. Literature suggests that RATS for lung procedures is safe and effective and should be considered as a valid additional surgical option.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Left Upper Lobectomy

Jie Xiang,Su Yang,Wei Guo,Runsen Jin,Yajie Zhang,Xingshi Chen,Han Wu,Hailei Du,Dingpei Han,Kai Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.01.10

2017-01-01

AME Medical Journal

Abstract:Robotic-assisted surgery is now widely used in the field of thoracic surgery. We are going to share the experience of robotic surgery for left upper lobectomy. A 63-year-old patient underwent robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for a primary non-small cell lung cancer. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without any perioperative complications. The pathological stage was T1aN0M0 (stage IA).
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Right Upper Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Jia Huang,Yu Tian,Qian-Jun Zhou,Jun-Wei Ning,Ze-Nan Gu,Pei-Ji Lu,Jian-Tao Li,Hao Lin,Tian-Xiang Chen,Yun-Hai Yang,Min P. Kim,Robert E. Merritt,Marco Ghisalberti,Long Jiang,Qing-Quan Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-960

2021-01-01

Translational Lung Cancer Research

Abstract:Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has been widely used in the treatment of lung cancer. The perioperative outcomes of right upper lobectomy (RUL) using RATS and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were retrospectively investigated and compared. We aimed to summarize a single-center experience of RATS and 4-port unidirectional VATS in RUL, and to discuss the safety and the essentials of the surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the 685 with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent minimally invasive RUL in our center by the same surgical group from January 2015 to December 2019. Both RATS and VATS were performed with three ports with utility incision. The 685 participants were divided into RATS (335 cases) and VATS (350 cases) groups according to surgical method. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes including dissected lymph nodes, postoperative duration of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: In the 685 patients enrolled, the baseline characteristics were comparable, and no postoperative 30-day mortality or intraoperative blood transfusion were observed. Compared with VATS, RATS had less surgical duration (90.22 +/- 12.16 vs. 92.68 +/- 12.26 min, P<0.001), less length of stay (4.71 +/- 1.37 vs. 5.26 +/- 1.56 days, P<0.001), and decreased postoperative duration of drainage (3.49 +/- 1.15 vs. 4.09 +/- 1.57 days, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the lymph nodes dissection, blood loss, conversion rate and morbidities. The cost of RATS was much higher than VATS (85,329.41 +/- 12,893.44 vs. 68,733.43 +/- 14,781.32 Conclusions: Robot assisted RUL had similar perioperative outcomes compared to VATS RUL lobectomy using similar three port with utility incision technique. The advantages of RATS included finer dissection of lymph node, relatively less operation time, earlier chest tube removal and discharge.
Development Review of Laparoscopic Surgical Robotic

Wei WANG,Wei-dong WANG,Zhi-yuan YAN,Zhi-jiang DU,Shi-lin HE,Guang-fei CHEN,Dan ZHOU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2014.08.03

2014-01-01

Abstract:In recent years, minimally invasive surgery gradually being accepted for its excellent medical effects.The minimally invasive surgical techniques combined with robot technology can make up for the deficiencies of traditional minimally invasive surgery and accelerate the evolution of minimally invasive surgery. Laparoscopic surgical robotics has become an important role in the research field of robotics. This paper describes laparoscopic surgical robots at home and abroad in detail and discusses the technical difficulties as well as the futuredevelopment direction.
Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future Directions

Hung Leng Kaan,Khek Yu Ho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19047

IF: 4.321

2020-03-15

Gut and Liver

Abstract:Therapeutic endoscopic resection has gained favor for its ability to achieve high en bloc and histologically complete resection rates via a minimally invasive approach. The main technical difficulties faced by interventionists are first the lack of traction causing suboptimal visualization of the dissection field and second, the lack of triangulation using existing therapeutic apparatuses. These challenges can be overcome with the use of robots and the multiple degrees of freedom afforded by the robotic wrists. Nevertheless, complications such as bleeding and perforation can occur. It is hence beneficial for the robotic device to be equipped with additional abilities such as suturing. Once the robotic prototypes have been fully optimized and marketed, a structured program should be instituted to ensure proper and adequate training of the end-users. The future of robotics should then explore the possibility of developing a soft robot or a robot with more natural human-like movements. A robot with a force feedback mechanism would be superior and improve safety. Eventually, a supervised autonomous robot may perform interventions with greater precision and accuracy than an expert procedurist. This review describes the benefits of robot-assisted endoscopic resections, recent developments aimed at managing iatrogenic complications and future directions for robotic endoscopy.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Ruijin Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2+3 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe

Han Wu,Su Yang,Wei Guo,Runsen Jin,Yajie Zhang,Xingshi Chen,Hailei Du,Dingpei Han,Kai Chen,Jie Xiang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.01.12

2017-01-01

AME Medical Journal

Abstract:Robotic-assisted thoracic segmentectomy is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of the resectable lung cancer. Its advantages over conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery include a clear and magnified three-dimensional operative field and the flexible multi-joint arms. This technical article presents a case from our center to share some surgical techniques for this procedure.
Robotic right colectomy versus laparoscopic right colectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a comparative study

Engeng Chen,Wei Zhang,Li Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02593-y

2024-10-26

BMC Surgery

Abstract:The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic right colectomy (RRC) versus laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in patients diagnosed with right colon cancer, given the increasing adoption of robotic surgical techniques and their potential benefits in oncologic surgery.

surgery

Robotic-assisted Right Upper Lobectomy: with the Further Research, Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Will Be Better in Future

Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe: Advantage of Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Promising Tool Should Not Be Denied

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: there is a long way to go

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Promising Surgical Method

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: There is a Long Way to Go.

Robotic Left Lower Lobectomy: Our Experience

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: from Laparoscopic Surgery to Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System

Reply to comments on “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”: incision positions, approaches and other problems

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Reply to Comments on "robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy": Incision Positions, Approaches and Other Problems.

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Cost and Lymph Node Dissection

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Current Technique and Outcomes

Approaches and outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) for lung cancer: a narrative review

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Left Upper Lobectomy

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Right Upper Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Development Review of Laparoscopic Surgical Robotic

Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Resection: Current Status and Future Directions

Ruijin Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2+3 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe

Robotic right colectomy versus laparoscopic right colectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a comparative study