Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Promising Tool Should Not Be Denied

Han Wu,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.68

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript (1). A robotic system has been used in thoracic surgery for more than 10 years, and the technique has matured and become common practice in many institutions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Robotic-assisted Right Upper Lobectomy: with the Further Research, Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Will Be Better in Future

Hong Du,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.56

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript entitled “Robotic-assisted right upper lobectomy” (1).
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: there is a long way to go

Chengqiang Li,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.81

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the reviewer’s excellent comments regarding robotic-assisted thoracoscopic S6 segmentectomy (1). We agree that there is no standardized technique for the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, but without a doubt, the future of surgery is going in the direction of single port access and robotics.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: There is a Long Way to Go.

Cheng-qiang Li,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.81

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the reviewer’s excellent comments regarding robotic-assisted thoracoscopic S6 segmentectomy (1). We agree that there is no standardized technique for the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach, but without a doubt, the future of surgery is going in the direction of single port access and robotics.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Promising Surgical Method

Sheng Yang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.57

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Jules Lin on our article “ Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: right inferior lobectomy ” (1). Your comments were valuable and helpful in improving our paper. We have studied your comments carefully and have made the suggested corrections, which we hope will meet with your approval. Our responses to your comments are below.
Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe: Advantage of Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Hong Du,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.80

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We are grateful for the reviewers’ comments on our manuscript entitled “Robotic thoracic surgery: S1+2 segmentectomy of the left upper lobe” (1). An advantage of robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is that the robotic arms are flexible and allow the surgeon to move instruments freely inside the chest cavity as needed without geometric limitations. Compared with single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), the flexibility is one of the primary advantages of robotic surgery. Although the literature revealed that RATS does not seem to offer any advantages over VATS with regards to complications, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and oncological outcome for early-stage lung cancer (2,3), the benefit of RATS is that the surgeon feels more comfortable and confident when performing RATS.
Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Liping Zeng,Tianyu He,Jian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.128714

2023-01-01

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Abstract:Minimally invasive techniques have been widely applied in general thoracic surgery. Compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), due to its theoretic superiority, robotic surgery is challenging the traditional position of VATS. With its unique advantages, including 3D vision and a high-freedom endowrist, it leads to easier lymph node dissection, more convenient blood vessel dissection, a shorter learning curve and competence for the completion of complex surgery. However, as a new surgical technology, the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) still need to be further verified. Thus, in this article, we review and summarize the application of RATS versus VATS in general thoracic surgery.
Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Zhehao He,Liping Zeng,Chong Zhang,Luming Wang,Zhitian Wang,Azmat Rustam,Chengli Du,Wang Lv,Jian Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.09.11

2017-01-01

Journal of Visualized Surgery

Abstract:Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a relatively new but rapidly adopted technique, pioneered by the urological and gynecological departments. The primary objective of this study is to present the current status, a series of improvement and innovation of Da Vinci robotic surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. In addition, we discuss the prospect of robotic surgical technology.
Robotic Left Lower Lobectomy: Our Experience

Rui Jin,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.55

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We very much appreciate the reviewer’s positive comments and constructive critiques (1), which were valuable in guiding development of our minimally invasive surgical methods. We have addressed all of the comments and provided our point-by-point responses below:
Postoperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Yanxia Hu,Jiajie Pu,Beiwen Wu,Xingshi Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.01.06

2017-01-01

AME Medical Journal

Abstract:With the widely application of da Vinci Surgical System in thoracic surgery, which has advantages such as less trauma, less bleeding, and quick recovery, the delivery of specialized nursing care has come to the forefront. However, there were few studies about the postoperative nursing for robot surgery. Therefore, we summarized our experience on enhanced recovery after robotic-assisted thoracic surgery.
Progress and prospect of robotic surgery

Wu Ji

2010-01-01

Abstract:Surgical robot not only has the features of minimal invasiveness,but also reveals unprecedented technical dominance to other methods.It upgrades the precision and feasibility of surgery to a totally new standard.Surgical robot has been widely applied in cardiothoracic,urologic,gynaecological and abdominal surgeries abroad.Favorable clinical results have been reported.Few medical units in our country have also purchased and applied it in recent years.This review aims to summarize the technical features and current progress of robotic surgery,analyze existing problems and prospect the future.
Nursing Cooperation for Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Surgery

Gongxian Wang,Yu Zeng,Xia Sheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0510-9_16

2021-01-01

Abstract:In the 1990s, the introduction of thoracoscopy revolutionized minimally invasive thoracic surgery. At present, almost all thoracic surgeries (except lung transplantation) can be performed using thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, VATS). However, VATS has limitations, including inconvenience of straight instruments (chopstick operation), two-dimensional surgical field, image instability, and unergonomic postures and angles for surgeons. In recent years, the emergence of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has provided a solution to the limitations of conventional VATS. The robotic system can provide three-dimensional images, allowing surgical procedures to achieve unprecedented precision. In addition, the robotic instruments have a range of motion close to that of human hands and can move more than 360° in a very small space (EndoWrist technology). At present, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been widely performed in hospitals with robotic systems in China.
Reply to comments on “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”: incision positions, approaches and other problems

Xingshi Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.45

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Wael C. Hanna from Canada (1) and Dr. Abbas E. Abbas from America (2) on our article “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”. In this article, we described our experience with robotic assisted right middle lobectomy through a specific case (3). As both Dr. Hanna and Dr. Abbas mentioned in their insightful comments, they preferred to line up all of the robotic ports in the same intercostal space (8 th intercostal space) to minimize postoperative pain. In robot-assisted thoracic surgery, the incision positions are flexible and their placement primarily depends on the practice and preference of the surgeon. Many surgeons place the ports in multiple locations in the intercostal space (4-6). Another important factor that we could not ignore is racial difference. Caucasians have wider chests than Chinese; the Chinese chest surface is 93% of the chest surface of Caucasians (7).
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Cost and Lymph Node Dissection

Jie Xiang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.46

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Turner and Dr. Molena (1). All of your comments were valuable and helpful in improving our paper. We have studied your comments carefully and have made the suggested corrections, which we hope will meet with your approval. Our responses to your comments are below.
Ruijin Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2+3 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe

Han Wu,Su Yang,Wei Guo,Runsen Jin,Yajie Zhang,Xingshi Chen,Hailei Du,Dingpei Han,Kai Chen,Jie Xiang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.01.12

2017-01-01

AME Medical Journal

Abstract:Robotic-assisted thoracic segmentectomy is a minimally invasive option for the treatment of the resectable lung cancer. Its advantages over conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery include a clear and magnified three-dimensional operative field and the flexible multi-joint arms. This technical article presents a case from our center to share some surgical techniques for this procedure.
Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy

Kai Chen,Su Yang,Wei Guo,Runsen Jin,Yajie Zhang,Xingshi Chen,Han Wu,Hailei Du,Dingpei Han,Jie Xiang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2017.01.16

2017-01-01

AME Medical Journal

Abstract:We are going to share the experience of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy. A 68-year-old patient underwent robotic-assisted thoracic surgery for a primary thymoma. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 3 without any perioperative complications. This case showed the robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy is a technically sound and safe approach for anterior mediastinal mass.
Robotic Lung Cancer Surgery: from Simple to Complex, from Surgery to Clinical Study.

Yu Han,Yajie Zhang,Chengqiang Li,Sheng Yang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.09.79

2020-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:The robotic surgical system has been increasingly utilized for thoracic surgeries in recent years. For the treatment of lung cancer, the safety and feasibility of robotic lobectomy, segmentectomy, and even sleeve resection have been demonstrated by a series studies (1-3). Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) was initiated in May 2015 in our department, and, as of June 2019, more than 1,000 cases have been performed, including lung surgery, esophagectomy for esophageal tumors, and mediastinal tumor resection. For robotic-assisted lung surgery, 530 patients underwent lobectomy, 204 patients underwent segmentectomy, and 8 patients underwent sleeve resection. We started from robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy, and sleeve resection was carried out when we acquired greater proficiency of the robotic surgical technique. To summarize our experience and improve the efficacy of robotic lung cancer surgery, several retrospective studies and prospective clinical trials have been conducted in our department.
Robotics in Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery: What, Why and When?

Konstantinos Gioutsos,Gregor J. Kocher,Ralph A. Schmid

2016-01-01

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted surgery emerged and evolved in order to increase the surgical precision and due to the need to overcome the drawbacks of conventional minimally invasive surgery. In thoracic surgery the first reported use of a robotic device was in a series of 12 patients with different lung pathologies with the assistance of the DaVinci Robotic Surgical System in 2002. The DaVinci system has been used for various procedures in the field of thoracic surgery since then. While its advantages for the resection of early stage thymoma have been well documented, its role in the treatment of lung cancer and other pathologies is still under investigation.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed on the following medical databases: Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The search was performed in June 2016 and was limited to material published since the first report of a robotic system for a surgical procedure in 1985.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The results for various thoracic surgical procedures were analyzed with focus on the benefits and limitations of the robotic system compared to open and thoracoscopic or video-assisted techniques.CONCLUSIONS: Although numerous studies have shown the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for various procedures, they were not able to show superior postoperative outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality in exchange for the higher costs of robotic surgery compared to conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), except for early-stage thymoma resection. Therefore, randomized control trials comparing robotic particularly with VATS, but also with open procedures arc required to further evaluate this crucial topic.
Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries

Kaity H. Tung,Sai Yendamuri,Kenneth P. Seastedt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195764

IF: 3.9

2024-09-28

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:With the paradigm shift in minimally invasive surgery from the video-assisted thoracoscopic platform to the robotic platform, thoracic surgeons are applying the new technology through various commonly practiced thoracic surgeries, striving to improve patient outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality. This review will discuss the updates in lung resections, lung transplantation, mediastinal surgeries with a focus on thymic resection, rib resection, tracheal resection, tracheobronchoplasty, diaphragm plication, esophagectomy, and paraesophageal hernia repair. The transition from open surgery to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to now robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery (RVATS) allows complex surgeries to be completed through smaller and smaller incisions with better visualization through high-definition images and finer mobilization, accomplishing what might be unresectable before, permitting shorter hospital stay, minimizing healing time, and encompassing broader surgical candidacy. Moreover, better patient outcomes are not only achieved through what the lead surgeon could carry out during surgeries but also through the training of the next generation via accessible live video feedback and recordings. Though larger volume randomized controlled studies are pending to compare the outcomes of VATS to RVATS surgeries, published studies show non-inferiority data from RVATS performances. With progressive enhancement, such as overcoming the lack of haptic feedback, and future incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI), the robotic platform will likely be a cost-effective route once surgeons overcome the initial learning curve.

medicine, general & internal
Robotic thoracic surgery using the single-port robotic system: Initial experience with more than 100 cases

Jun Hee Lee,Tae Hyun Park,Hyun Koo Kim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.005

IF: 6.439

2024-04-30

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract:Objective This study aimed to report the initial experiences of 115 patients who underwent robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci single-port robotic surgical system (Intuitive Surgical). Methods Robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci single-port robotic surgical system was performed on 115 patients between November 2020 and June 2023. Patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results The type of surgeries included thymectomy, mediastinal mass excision, anatomical pulmonary resection (including lobectomy and segmentectomy), esophagectomy, and enucleation of esophageal submucosal tumors in 41, 13, 54, 5, and 2 patients, respectively. The mean total operative time and chest tube duration for different procedures were as follows: thymectomy, 152.9. ± 6.7 minutes and 1.2 ± 0.5 days; mediastinal mass excision, 93.3 ± 26.5 minutes and 1.0 ± 0 days; anatomical pulmonary resection, 187.2 ± 55.8 minutes and 2.5 ± 1.5 days; esophagectomy, 485 ± 111.9 minutes and 12 ± 4.6 days; and enucleation of esophageal submucosal tumors, 170 ± 30 minutes and 5.5 ± 0.5 days, respectively. Conversion to a thoracotomy or sternotomy was not required. Conversion to video-assisted thoracic surgery occurred in 1 patient, and an additional port was applied in 2 patients. Two patients experienced postoperative complications greater than grade IIIa. Conclusions Robotic thoracic surgery using the da Vinci single-port robotic surgical system is feasible and safe in various fields of thoracic surgery, including complex procedures such as anatomical pulmonary resection and esophagectomy. More complex thoracic surgeries can be performed with the continuous advancement and innovation of instruments in robotic systems.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system
Reply to Comments on "robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy": Incision Positions, Approaches and Other Problems.

Xingshi Chen,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.10.45

2017-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:We appreciate the thoughtful and constructive comments by Dr. Wael C. Hanna from Canada (1) and Dr. Abbas E. Abbas from America (2) on our article “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”. In this article, we described our experience with robotic assisted right middle lobectomy through a specific case (3). As both Dr. Hanna and Dr. Abbas mentioned in their insightful comments, they preferred to line up all of the robotic ports in the same intercostal space (8 th intercostal space) to minimize postoperative pain. In robot-assisted thoracic surgery, the incision positions are flexible and their placement primarily depends on the practice and preference of the surgeon. Many surgeons place the ports in multiple locations in the intercostal space (4-6). Another important factor that we could not ignore is racial difference. Caucasians have wider chests than Chinese; the Chinese chest surface is 93% of the chest surface of Caucasians (7).

Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Promising Tool Should Not Be Denied

Robotic-assisted Right Upper Lobectomy: with the Further Research, Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Will Be Better in Future

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: there is a long way to go

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy: There is a Long Way to Go.

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Promising Surgical Method

Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe: Advantage of Robotic Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Initial Experience of Da Vinci Robotic Thoracic Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University.

Robotic Left Lower Lobectomy: Our Experience

Postoperative Management of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Progress and prospect of robotic surgery

Nursing Cooperation for Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Surgery

Reply to comments on “ Robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy ”: incision positions, approaches and other problems

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Cost and Lymph Node Dissection

Ruijin Robotic Thoracic Surgery: S1+2+3 Segmentectomy of the Left Upper Lobe

Robotic-assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy

Robotic Lung Cancer Surgery: from Simple to Complex, from Surgery to Clinical Study.

Robotics in Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery: What, Why and When?

Adoption of the Robotic Platform across Thoracic Surgeries

Robotic thoracic surgery using the single-port robotic system: Initial experience with more than 100 cases

Reply to Comments on "robotic Assisted Right Middle Lobectomy": Incision Positions, Approaches and Other Problems.