Corrigendum to “activity, Performance, and Durability for the Reduction of Oxygen in PEM Fuel Cells, of Fe/N/C Electrocatalysts Obtained from the Pyrolysis of Metal-Organic-Framework and Iron Porphyrin Precursors” [electrochimica Acta 159 (2015) 184–197]

Lijun Yang,Nicholas Larouche,Régis Chénitz,Gaixia Zhang,Michel Lefèvre,Jean‐Pol Dodelet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.221

IF: 6.6

2015-01-01

Electrochimica Acta

Abstract:The authors regret On, lines 79 to 88) This is the text which was published. From the durability experiments performed in H2/O2 or in H2/Air fuel cells, one may therefore conclude that even the most stable nonPGM catalysts is still a long way from delivering powers comparable to that delivered in the same conditions and for several thousands of hours by Pt. Indeed, at 0.4V and with a loading of 0.3mg Pt cm−2 at the cathode, a H2/Air PEM fuel cell delivers 3.4 A cm−2 (and therefore 1.36W cm−2) using a Nafion NR211 membrane, 15 psi of backpressure of fully humidified H2 and O2 fed at 0.3 lpm to the anode and the cathode of the MEA. Below is the text that should correct it. What has been changed or added is now in bold. From the durability experiments performed in H2/O2 or in H2/Air fuel cells, one may therefore conclude that even the most stable nonPGM catalysts is still a long way from delivering powers comparable to that delivered in the same conditions and for several thousands of hours by Pt. Indeed, at 0.4V and with a loading of 0.3mg Pt cm−2 at the cathode, a H2/O2 PEM fuel cell delivers 3.4 A cm−2 (and therefore 1.36W cm−2) using a Nafion NR211 membrane, 15 psi of backpressure of fully humidified H2 and O2 fed at 0.3 lpm to the anode and the cathode of theMEA,while a H2/Air PEM fuel cell delivers 2.3 A cm−2 (and therefore 0.92W cm-2) in the same experimental conditions. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.