Enhanced Catalyst Stability Via Chemically Grafted Polyaniline Groups for PEMFC

Li Chenzhao,Limin Zhu,Qing Gong,Liang Song,Chengjun Sun,Yuzi Liu,Jian Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2021-01461860mtgabs
2021-01-01
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:The promising performance from the platinum group metal (PGM) catalysts make them the most practical catalysts for the commercialization of the polymer membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). However, the excellent initial performance is not good enough for massive applications, particular for the fuel cell vehicles, which requires the long-term durability. Both the performance and the durability of catalysts strongly impact the applications in a wide range of operations of fuel cells, from stationary power generation to the transportation power propulsion. Catalyst stability plays a very important role on reducing the operation cost and increasing the lifetime of PEMFCs. Herein, a concept is proposed, which enhances the lifetime of PEMFCs through engineering the surface of catalyst supports. By covalently grafting NH2 groups on carbon (NGCB) surface, followed by polymerizing polyaniline (PANI) onsite on NFCB surface (using introduced NH2 groups as precursor), Pt L-edge goes to higher energy level, suggested by XAS measurement. Such modification can increase the barrier for Pt’s oxidation. In this study, carbon supports with different PANI loadings were synthesized and the Pt nanoparticles were loaded onto these supports. The synthesized catalysts were characterized for their morphology and structure using TEM, XRD, BET and Hg porosimetry. Both RDE and MEA tests were carried out for these catalysts for their fuel cell performance. The results show that the energy levels of Pt L-edge were increased with PANI loading. Besides, the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) testing results prove that the catalyst stability was improved with PANI loading in certain range. Three different PANI loadings were analyzed: 0.2, 0.25 and 0.33 in mass fraction of NFCB. MEAs results show that the beginning of life (BOL) performances of three catalysts were almost same. But when it comes to the catalyst stability test, the performance losses between BOL and EOL at 0.8 A·cm-2 in air are 120 mV, 90 mV and 45 mV for the three catalysts, respectively, after 30k square wave cycling using the standard testing protocol from the Department of Energy (DOE).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?