Quality of General Medical Care in Community Health Centers in 2019—2020:overview and Problems Analysis
JIN Hua,YI Chuntao,NI Hengru,GU Wenye,GU Jiangtao,CHEN Yuge,YU Dehua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.335
2022-01-01
Abstract:BackgroundStrengtheningclinical quality control and supervision is one of the effective ways to ensure medical quality. Supervising the quality of general medical care in primary care settings in the local region could contribute to the systematical assessment of general medical care quality and identification of relevantproblems in such settings.ObjectiveTo analyze the supervision of quality of general medical care in Shanghai's primary care settings conducted in 2019 and 2020, and based on this, to give targeted, rational recommendations on the identified problems in quality management of general medical care.MethodsThe quality of general medical care in a cluster sample of community health centers (CHCs) of Shanghai was supervised in 2019 and 2020 by relevant experts from Shanghai's municipal and district general practice quality control departments using the Clinical Quality Control and Supervision Standards for General Medical Care in Shanghai's Community Health Centers (hereinafter referred to as CQCSS) developed by Shanghai General Practice Clinical Quality Control Center. In May 2021, the supervision results of the two years were analyzed using descriptive analysis, then compared, and the identified problems were summarized and analyzed.ResultsTwo hundred and forty-three CHCs were involved in the 2019 supervision, and 244 were involved in the 2020 supervision. The average total CQCSS score for 2019 was (87.32±5.97) points, and that for 2020 was (86.67±5.36) points. Compared to the results in 2019, the scores of first-level indicators of basic conditions (99.93% vs 99.80%) , staffing and determining job responsibilities of general practitioners (GPs) (93.44% vs 91.90%) , diagnosis and treatment ability of GPs (85.82% vs 85.72%) , chronic disease management ability of GPs (81.07% vs 80.95%) and scientific research and teaching levels (29.99% vs 28.87%) increased in 2020. The problems mentioned were mainly distributed in five aspects: staffing〔176 (22.03%) 〕, GPs' clinical management ability〔154 (19.27%) 〕, quality of inpatient medical records〔92 (11.51%) 〕, quality of home sickbed patients' medical records〔91 (11.39%) 〕, allocation of facilities〔91 (11.39%) 〕. In terms of the mentioned frequency, the top five problems were: ineligible senior GPs to registered GPs ratio〔84 (10.51%) 〕, poor scientific research〔84 (10.51%) 〕, less than 3.5 GPs per 1 000 residents〔61 (7.63%) 〕, unsatisfactory clinical skills〔40 (5.01%) 〕, and insufficient number of home sickbeds〔36 (4.51%) 〕.ConclusionThese two years of quality control supervision has initially promoted the quality improvementof general medical care in CHCs. To further improve it, it is suggested to take actions to deepen the core essence of general medical care quality management, improve the diagnosis and treatment ability of GPs, as well as their teaching and research ability.