Molecular Phylogeny and Diversification of the Genus Odorrana (amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) Inferred from Two Mitochondrial Genes

Xiaohong Chen,Zhuo Chen,Jianping Jiang,Qiao Li,Youqiang Lu,Kaiya Zhou,Guangmei Zheng,Xiaofei Zhai,Jianxin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.023
IF: 5.019
2013-01-01
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Abstract:A diversity of hypotheses have been proposed for phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy within the genus Odorrana, and great progress has been made over the past several decades. However, there is still some controversy concerning relationships among Odorrana species. Here, we used many paratypes and topotypes and utilized 1.81 kb of mitochondrial sequence data to generate a phylogeny for approximately 4/5 of Odorrana species, and Odorrana haplotypes form a strongly supported monophyletic group relative to the other genera sampled. The deepest phylogenetic divergences within Odorrana separate 3 lineages whose interrelationships are not recovered with strong support. These lineages include the ancestral lineage of O. chapaensis, the ancestral lineage of a strongly supported clade comprising many western species, and the ancestral lineage of a strongly supported clade comprising all other Odorrana sampled. Within the latter clade, the first phylogenetic split separates O. ishikawae from a well-supported clade comprising its other species. These divergences likely occurred in the middle Miocene, approximately 12-15 million years ago. Separation of the ancestral lineage of Odorrana from its closest relative, Babina in our study, likely occurred in the early Miocene or possibly late Oligocene. Rates of lineage accumulation remained high from the middle Miocene through the Pleistocene.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?