EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHINESE RANID FROGS INFERRED FROM MITOCHONDRIAL DNA SEQUENCES OF 12S rRNA GENE

Jian-Ping JIANG,Kai-Ya ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-5507.2001.01.007
2001-01-01
Abstract:Approximately 400 base pairs of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene from 24 species of Chinese ranid frogs (Table 1) were sequenced. Phylogenetic analyses of these data using neighbor-joining method showed that these frogs were divided into three lineages. The first lineage (BCL 78%) contains 7 species, Fejervarya limnocharis, Hoplobatrachus rugulosus, Limnonectes fujianensis, Paa boulengeri, P.spinosa, P.robertingeri, and Nanorana pleskei, of which 3 species of Paa forming a monophyletic group (BCL 99%). The second lineage (BCL 99%) comprises 3 species, Amolops daiyunensis, A. ricketti, and A. wuyiensis, coresponding to the subfamily Amolopinae. The rest 14 species belong to the third lineage (BCL 61%), of which 5 species of Rana and 4 species of Odorrana forming a monophyletic group respectively. Two species of Pelophylax cluster together before they cluster with the genus Hylarana. Two species of Rugosa form a clade before they cluster with the monophyletic group of 5 species of Rana. The second and third lineage cluster at BCL=85%, and a sister group relationship between the cluster and the first lineage is recognized. In other words, the first lineage comprising 7 species of the subfamily Raninae and the third lineage comprising 14 species of the subfamily Raninae do not cluster directly. This result suggests that the frogs of the first lineage are probably excluded from the subfamily Raninae. In addition, the molecular evidence supports the establishment of ranid genera Fejervarya, Limnonectes, Hoplobatrachus, Paa, Odorrana, Rugosa and Pelophylax. They were separated from the genus Rana which now represent only Brown frogs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?