Abstract:Traditionally, scholars in physics education research pay attention to students solving well-structured learning activities, which provide restricted room for collaboration and idea-generation due to their close-ended nature. In order to encourage the socialization of information among group members, we utilized a real-world problem where students were asked to generate a well-structured physics task, and investigated how student groups collaborated to create physics problems for younger students at an introductory physics course at a university in northern Chile. Data collection consists of audio recording the group discussions while they were collaborating to develop their physics problems as well as the solutions they created to their problems. Through interviews, we accessed students' perceptions on the task and its challenges. Results suggest that generating problems is an opportunity for students to propose ideas and make decisions regarding the goals of the problem, concepts and procedures, contextual details and magnitudes and units to introduce in their generated problems. In addition, we found evidence that groups tested the validity of their creations by engaging in strategies often observed with algebra-based physics problems, such as mathematical procedures and qualitative descriptions of the physics embedded in the problem, yet groups invested more time with algebra-based strategies compared to more qualitative descriptions. Students valued the open-ended nature of the task and recognized its benefits in utilizing physics ideas into context, which in turn enabled collaboration in a way not experienced with traditional algebra-based problems. These findings support the use of generative activities as a pathway for students to engage in real-world physics problems that allow for a range and variety of collective processes and ideas.

From a systematic investigation of faculty-produced Think-Pair-Share questions to frameworks for characterizing and developing fluency-inspiring activities

Brief, embedded, spontaneous metacognitive talk indicates thinking like a physicist

Creating a More Equitable Introductory Physics Classroom Through Invitational Phrasing in Question Solicitation

Oersted Lecture 2013: How should we think about how our students think?

Critical thinking development in physics courses by PBL in virtual collaboration environments

Developing Peer Instruction questions for quantitative problems for an upper-division astronomy course

Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository

Facebook-supported tasks for exploring critical and creative thinking in a physics teaching course

Are we teaching students to think like scientists?

Investigating how students collaborate to generate physics problems through structured tasks

Analyzing students collaboratively solving spherical unit vector problems in upper level E and M through a lens of shared resources

Toolboxes and handing students a hammer: The effects of cueing and instruction on getting students to think critically

Developing a reasoning inventory for measuring physics quantitative literacy

Designing Effective Questions for Classroom Response System Teaching

Student and AI responses to physics problems examined through the lenses of sensemaking and mechanistic reasoning

Effect of pressure on the superconducting transition temperature of doped and neutron-damaged MgB2

Student facility with ratio and proportion: Mapping the reasoning space in introductory physics

Instructing nontraditional physics labs: Toward responsiveness to student epistemic framing

Using psychometric tools as a window into students' quantitative reasoning in introductory physics

Classroom Interaction in Science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses

Characterizing active learning environments in physics using network analysis and COPUS observations