Abstract:With a few notable exceptions formal semantics, as it originated from the seminal work of Richard Montague, Donald Davidson, Max Cresswell, David Lewis and others, in the late sixties and early seventies of the previous century, does not consider Wittgenstein as one of its ancestors. That honour is bestowed on Frege, Tarski, Carnap. And so it has been in later developments. Most introductions to the subject will refer to Frege and Tarski (Carnap less frequently) —in addition to the pioneers just mentioned, of course— , and discuss the main elements of their work that helped shape formal semantics in some detail. But Wittgenstein is conspicuously absent whenever the history of the subject is mentioned (usually briefly, if at all). Of course, if one thinks of Wittgenstein’s later work, this is obvious: nothing, it seems, could be more antithetic to what formal semantics aims for and to how it pursues those aims than the views on meaning and language that Wittgenstein expounds in, e.g., Philosophical Investigations, with its insistence on particularity and diversity, and its rejection of explanation and formal modelling. But what about his earlier work, the Tractatus (henceforth )? At first sight, that seems much more congenial, as it develops a conception of language and meaning that is both general and uniform, explanatory and formal. In view of that, the general lack of reference to  is curious. The central claim of the present paper is that, actually, this is an oversight. Perhaps Wittgenstein was no conscious influence on the minds of Montague c.s. at the time, but he did play a major role in establishing the fundamental principles and philosophical assumptions that helped shape formal semantics and make it such a successful enterprise, in linguistics and in philosophy. The actual channels through which this transmission of concepts and ideas has taken place is not what we will be focusing on here. That is another story, and a complicated one, which requires more historical knowledge and skills than we can muster. Rather, we will be content with discussing some systematic

De Tractatus Lezen. En Waarderen

Tractatus, Application and Use

The architecture of meaning: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and formal semantics

The Entanglement of Psychologism and Logicism-To Review the Intellectual History of the Relevant Disputations between E. Husserl and W. Wundt

Ethics and morality, principles and practice

A Visual Representation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein'S Tractatus

The subject of literature, the subject of philosophy: Plato, Wittgenstein, and Kierkegaard's reading of Abraham

Logical Given, Interactive Negotiation and Self-Denial of Self-Consciousness-Hegelian Pragmatism in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy and Its Critique

Reading, Writing, and Translation in Gadamer’s Hermeneutic Philosophy

In defence of language-interpretive social science: on the critiques of Peter Winch’s conception of understanding

A Reflection on the Clash between A.Bloom and J.Rawls——On the Challenge of Strauss School to Modernity Scholarship

Reading: skilled linguistic action

On the Relevance of Literature to Life: The Significance of the Act of Reading

On Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics

Interpreting Wittgenstein’s “Phenomenology”: A Relevant History from the End of 1960’s to the Early 21th Century

Jacques Derrida's Deconstruction and Qoheleth's "dialectics of Language"

Frege , Russell and Wittgenstein on the Judgment Stroke

Wittgenstein, Hegel And Cognition

6. Making sense of reading

Naturalising Mathematics? A Wittgensteinian Perspective