Interpreting Wittgenstein’s “Phenomenology”: A Relevant History from the End of 1960’s to the Early 21th Century

Xu Yingjin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19862/j.cnki.xsyk.2005.04.008
2005-01-01
Abstract:Being independent of the influence of the continental phenomenological movement, Ludwig Wittgenstein developed his own edition of “phenomenology” as soon as he returned to Cambridge University at the beginning of 1929. What’s the definition of his “phenomenology”? When and how this “phenomenology” came into being? What kind of role did it play in his philosophical transition? What is the relationship between his “phenomenology” and Husserl’s relevant ideas? ——Since the so-called “the puzzles of Wittgenstein’s phenomenology” was discovered by Herbert Spiegelberg in 1968, different strategies of interpreting Wittgenstein’s “Phenomenology” appeared in the international philosophical circle one after another. This article, however, would be devoted into introducing these achievements to the readers in order to demonstrate to the Chinese-spoken philosophical circle the philosophical significance of Wittgenstein’s “phenomenological period” and the difficulties in interpreting it, and provides basic academic background for the discussion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?