Abstract:Philosophy is often thought to deal with problems, enigmas or conundra it seeks to answer, for instance through a theory. Wittgenstein and Hegel both challenge this view in different ways. Wittgenstein can be understood as passing through two main phases. In an initial phase, he proposes a view that presupposes a conception of language he later rejects. In a later phase, he rejects his earlier theory and philosophy in all its forms. In other words, after the effective refutation of what he earlier thought was the only approach, he drew the conclusion that there was no longer any possibly valid approach. This suggests the only possible result is skepticism, not about knowledge but rather about philosophy as a source of knowledge. In this sense, Wittgenstein suggests that in his later thought he brings philosophy to a skeptical end. In comparison to Wittgenstein, Hegel has a less extreme view. He neither claims to formulate the only possible approach to knowledge, hence to bring the tradition to an end, nor that philosophy ends in skepticism. He rather vindicates the Parmenidean approach that we are justified in claiming to know that knowledge is possible within the limits of the identity of thought and being.

Wittgenstein’s Reconsideration of the Transcendental Problem

Wittgenstein's Reconsideration on Transcendental Problem——Also on the Relationship Between Wittgenstein's "phenomenology" and Husserl's Phenomenology

Wittgenstein's Re-consideration of "explanation" and "Understanding"

Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein'S Tractatus

Longitudinal-Intentionality:Time, Genesis, History——Husserl’s Understanding of their Immanent Relationship

Wittgenstein, Hegel And Cognition

Interpreting Wittgenstein’s “Phenomenology”: A Relevant History from the End of 1960’s to the Early 21th Century

The Phenomenological-Ontological Dimension of Philosophy of History: the Problem of History in Husserl and Heidegger

Between The"silence"and The"speech"--consideration of Wittgenstein to The"philosophy Problem"

Transcendental Logic:the Logic Outline of Husserl's Phenomenology

From the “Logic of Illusion” to “the Logic of Phenomenology”

Wittgenstein, Phenomenology and Cognitive Linguistics

From Kant's "the Hatred of Reason" to Hegel's "the Cunning of Reason"

From A Priori Logic to The Use of Language——A Paraphrase to Philosophical Investigations §§89-133

Wittgenstein and the Dualism of the Inner and the Outer

Critical Remarks on Husserl'S Thought Path from Ego to Lebenswelt on Husserl'S Transcendental Phenomenology and Its Limits in Heinrich Rombach

Radical Scepticism, How-Possible Questions and Modest Transcendental Arguments

Reduction and Construction——Interpreting The Idea of Phenomenology

Moving out of the Plight of "Monologue" —— On Wittgenstein’s Private Language

Solipsistic and Symbiotic: Intersubjective Idea of Neo-phenomenology

The Linguistic Turn of Ontological Investigation:A Comment on the Approaches of Analytical Philosophy